Literature DB >> 14519727

The accuracy of guestimates.

Iain McLean1, C Mary Anderson, Cath White.   

Abstract

At times a clinician must describe the size of a lesion when measurement presents difficulties. A 'guestimate' may then be recorded. We tested the accuracy of forensic clinicians (10 physicians and 1 nurse) in guestimating the sizes of ten test objects, comparing their performance with 13 individuals from other professions. The participants were permitted to handle the objects but not to use a measuring device. For three of the objects (a balloon, a scratch and a coin) the entire sample of participants significantly overestimated size, by 13-22%. Both participant groups overestimated the size of a scratch, the clinicians being more accurate but not significantly so. Guestimates should be avoided unless the use of a ruler or tape measure will be against the interests of the client.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14519727      PMCID: PMC544630          DOI: 10.1177/014107680309601007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  1 in total

1.  The precision of size constancy.

Authors:  S P McKee; L Welch
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.886

  1 in total
  2 in total

1.  Endoscopic measurement of variceal diameter.

Authors:  Zhi-Qun Li; En-Qiang Linghu; Min Hu; Xiang-Dong Wang; Hong-Bin Wang; Jing-Yun Meng; Hong Du
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Guestimates.

Authors:  D W Sarll
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 18.000

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.