Literature DB >> 14519587

Comparing the quality of three models of postabortion care in public hospitals in Mexico City.

Deborah L Billings1, Jaime Fuentes Velásquez, Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Each year, an estimated 120,000 women in Mexico seek treatment in public hospitals for abortion-related complications--the country's fourth leading cause of maternal mortality. Models of postabortion care emphasizing counseling and provision of contraceptives have the potential to improve the quality of care these women receive.
METHODS: Between April 1997 and August 1998, women treated for abortion complications in six Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) hospitals in the Mexico City metropolitan area were surveyed. Data related to patient-provider interaction, information provision and counseling were analyzed for three models of care: sharp curettage standard care, sharp curettage postabortion care and manual vacuum aspiration postabortion care.
RESULTS: Women in the two postabortion care groups rated the quality of services they received more highly than did those receiving sharp curettage standard care. A significantly greater proportion of women treated under the postabortion care models than of those treated under the sharp curettage standard model received information about their health status before treatment, the uterine evacuation procedure, signs of postabortion complications and care at home. In addition, a greater proportion of women treated under the postabortion care models accepted a contraceptive method before leaving the facility (64-78% vs. 40%).
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a postabortion care model contributes to the delivery of high-quality services to women experiencing abortion complications. The standard IMSS model of postabortion treatment should be modified to emulate those in hospitals that systematically link general counseling and family planning services to the clinical services provided to women with abortion complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14519587     DOI: 10.1363/ifpp.29.112.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Fam Plan Perspect        ISSN: 0190-3187


  6 in total

1.  What post-abortion care indicators don't measure: Global abortion politics and obstetric practice in Senegal.

Authors:  Siri Suh
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Clients' perceptions of the quality of care in Mexico city's public-sector legal abortion program.

Authors:  Davida Becker; Claudia Díaz-Olavarrieta; Clara Juárez; Sandra G García; Patricio Sanhueza; Cynthia C Harper
Journal:  Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2011-12

Review 3.  Preconception care: promoting reproductive planning.

Authors:  Sohni V Dean; Zohra S Lassi; Ayesha M Imam; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.223

4.  Dimensions of patient satisfaction with comprehensive abortion care in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Bekalu Mossie Chekol; Dame Abera Abdi; Tamirie Andualem Adal
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  Trends in Comprehensive Abortion Care (CAC) and characteristics of women receiving abortion care in a tertiary hospital in Nepal.

Authors:  Jamuna Tamrakar Sayami
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Medium and long-term adherence to postabortion contraception among women having experienced unsafe abortion in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Authors:  Vibeke Rasch; Fortunata Yambesi; Siriel Massawe
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.