Literature DB >> 14519041

Adverse event reporting with selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors.

Nicole R Hartnell1, James P Wilson, Nick C Patel, M Lynn Crismon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Weber effect is a phenomenon which states that the number of reported adverse reactions for a drug increases until the middle to end of the second year of marketing. The purpose of this study was to examine the number of adverse event reports associated with specific selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use.
METHODS: Data used in this study included voluntary adverse event reports submitted to the US federal government through the Spontaneous Reporting System and Adverse Event Reporting System. Adverse event reports were analyzed for the following SSRIs: citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline.
RESULTS: Adverse event reporting associated with fluvoxamine demonstrates the Weber effect. Adverse events related to fluoxetine, paroxetine, and sertraline do not exhibit the Weber effect. Fluoxetine-related adverse events peaked at year 3, with peaks also occurring during the 10th and 12th years after market entry. Adverse event reports associated with paroxetine and sertraline use increased 5-8 years after market entry.
CONCLUSIONS: Within 1 class of medications, it is possible for a few agents to exhibit the Weber effect, while there is no definite pattern with others. A new observation in adverse event reporting is introduced and suggests that a peak in adverse event reporting occurs 1-2 years after a medication receives approval for a new indication. Future research is necessary to validate this effect and examine the generalizability to other medications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14519041     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1C522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  7 in total

1.  Trends of reporting of 'serious'vs. 'non-serious' adverse drug reactions over time: a study in the French PharmacoVigilance Database.

Authors:  Guillaume Moulis; Agnès Sommet; Geneviève Durrieu; Haleh Bagheri; Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre; Jean-Louis Montastruc
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Use of an entacapone-containing drug combination and risk of death: Analysis of the FDA AERS (FAERS) database.

Authors:  Thamir M Alshammari; Eman N AlMutairi
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Effect of abrupt substitution of gadobenate dimeglumine for gadopentetate dimeglumine on rate of allergic-like reactions.

Authors:  Matthew S Davenport; Jonathan R Dillman; Richard H Cohan; Hero K Hussain; Shokoufeh Khalatbari; Jonathan B McHugh; James H Ellis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Adverse event reporting patterns of newly approved drugs in the USA in 2006: an analysis of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System data.

Authors:  Pankdeep Chhabra; Xing Chen; Sheila R Weiss
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  The Weber effect and the United States Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS): analysis of sixty-two drugs approved from 2006 to 2010.

Authors:  Keith B Hoffman; Mo Dimbil; Colin B Erdman; Nicholas P Tatonetti; Brian M Overstreet
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Relevance of the Weber effect in contemporary pharmacovigilance of oncology drugs.

Authors:  Ankur Arora; Rajinder K Jalali; Divya Vohora
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Reporting rates of adverse reactions to specialty care medicines exhibit a direct positive correlation with patient exposure: A lack of evidence for the Weber effect.

Authors:  Vikas Modgill; Léa Dormegny; David J Lewis
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 4.335

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.