Literature DB >> 14518449

What's new in cartilage?

Garry E Gold1, Thomas R McCauley, Martha L Gray, David G Disler.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of articular cartilage is important in evaluation of new surgical and pharmacologic treatments for cartilage damage. Many techniques exist for MR imaging of articular cartilage. Standard techniques for morphologic imaging of cartilage include fast spin-echo and spoiled gradient-echo imaging. These methods provide high-resolution morphologic images of cartilage but are time-consuming in the clinical setting. New methods for faster or higher-resolution morphologic imaging include techniques based on steady-state free precession imaging. These fast techniques will allow detailed evaluation of cartilage in the routine clinical setting. There are also several MR imaging methods that may provide information about the structure and physiology of cartilage. Physiologic imaging may allow detailed evaluation of the glycosaminoglycan matrix or collagen network of articular cartilage and may be the most sensitive method for detection of early changes. With the development of new therapies for osteoarthritis and cartilage injury, MR imaging of articular cartilage is of increasing clinical importance. MR imaging will play an important role in evaluation of the effectiveness of these therapies. Copyright RSNA, 2003

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14518449     DOI: 10.1148/rg.235035113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  25 in total

Review 1.  Muskuloskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Nicolae Bolog; Daniel Nanz; Dominik Weishaupt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  MR imaging of articular cartilage physiology.

Authors:  Jung-Ah Choi; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  [Morphological and functional cartilage imaging].

Authors:  C Rehnitz; M-A Weber
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Hylan G-F 20 efficacy on articular cartilage quality in patients with knee osteoarthritis: clinical and MRI assessment.

Authors:  D Cubukçu; F Ardiç; N Karabulut; O Topuz
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  [Morphological and functional cartilage imaging].

Authors:  C Rehnitz; M-A Weber
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 6.  Sodium and T1rho MRI for molecular and diagnostic imaging of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Arijitt Borthakur; Eric Mellon; Sampreet Niyogi; Walter Witschey; J Bruce Kneeland; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  The relationship between the MRI features of mild osteoarthritis in the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral compartments of the knee.

Authors:  Peter R Kornaat; Iain Watt; Naghmeh Riyazi; Margreet Kloppenburg; Johan L Bloem
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Novel contrast mechanisms at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla.

Authors:  Ravinder R Regatte; Mark E Schweitzer
Journal:  Semin Musculoskelet Radiol       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Comparative study of imaging at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T of the knee.

Authors:  Scott Wong; Lynne Steinbach; Jian Zhao; Christoph Stehling; C Benjamin Ma; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Cartilage imaging at 3.0T with gradient refocused acquisition in the steady-state (GRASS) and IDEAL fat-water separation.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Michael Tuite; Leo Passov; Ann Shimakawa; Huanzhou Yu; Huanzhou Hu; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.