BACKGROUND/AIMS: SEN virus (SENV) was discovered in 1999 as a DNA virus with hepatotropic properties. Nine genotypes (A-I) have been identified with genotypes D and H being more prevalent in cases of chronic hepatitis. Attempts to determine whether SENV causes liver disease have been hampered by limited diagnostic testing. METHODS: In the present study, we developed two PCR based assays; a general SENV screening and genotype-specific assay. RESULTS: By screening PCR, the specificity for all SENV genotypes and SENV-related sequences was 20/20 (100%) with confirmation of the results being provided by genomic sequencing. With the genotype-specific PCR, specificities for SENV-D and SENV-H were 7/7 (100%) and 7/11 (64%), respectively. All screening PCR products were cloned and sequenced. The results of sequencing showed high genetic diversity in representative SENV genotypes. Five of twenty patients (25%) had mixed infections with several SENV genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The screening PCR was useful for identifying cases of SENV infection. However, because of high genetic divergence and mixed co-infection, it was difficult to establish a specific method for genotype distinction. Hence, sequencing is still required for further investigations of SENV as a potential cause of liver disease.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: SEN virus (SENV) was discovered in 1999 as a DNA virus with hepatotropic properties. Nine genotypes (A-I) have been identified with genotypes D and H being more prevalent in cases of chronic hepatitis. Attempts to determine whether SENV causes liver disease have been hampered by limited diagnostic testing. METHODS: In the present study, we developed two PCR based assays; a general SENV screening and genotype-specific assay. RESULTS: By screening PCR, the specificity for all SENV genotypes and SENV-related sequences was 20/20 (100%) with confirmation of the results being provided by genomic sequencing. With the genotype-specific PCR, specificities for SENV-D and SENV-H were 7/7 (100%) and 7/11 (64%), respectively. All screening PCR products were cloned and sequenced. The results of sequencing showed high genetic diversity in representative SENV genotypes. Five of twenty patients (25%) had mixed infections with several SENV genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: The screening PCR was useful for identifying cases of SENV infection. However, because of high genetic divergence and mixed co-infection, it was difficult to establish a specific method for genotype distinction. Hence, sequencing is still required for further investigations of SENV as a potential cause of liver disease.
Authors: I Schréter; P Kristian; P Jarcuska; S Porubcin; L Siegfried; E Birosová; A Rajnic; A Gocalová Journal: Folia Microbiol (Praha) Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Elmoeiz A Elnagi; Thekra N Al-Maqati; Yaser Alnaam; Ahmed A Adam; Ali A Rabaan; Zeinab S Mohamed; Anisah Amer; Hussa L Almarfoi Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 4.219