Literature DB >> 14516485

Methadone and metabolite urine concentrations in patients maintained on methadone.

Kenzie L Preston1, David H Epstein, David Davoudzadeh, Marilyn A Huestis.   

Abstract

As regulatory control over methadone maintenance relaxes, the need for methods of monitoring compliance will increase. In community clinics, monitoring would most likely involve immunoassays of outpatients' trough urine specimens. There are no published norms for such data. Therefore, we determined concentrations of methadone in 1093 urine specimens collected thrice weekly in 27 outpatients during up to 17 weeks of observed methadone ingestion (35 to 80 mg/day) using a semiquantitative homogeneous enzyme immunoassay (CEDIA). We used a separate CEDIA assay to measure methadone's main metabolite, 2-ethylidene-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP), which may help detect compliance in fast metabolizers or patients who adulterate samples to simulate compliance. Methadone concentrations were more variable than those of EDDP. Concentrations of methadone were < 100 ng/mL in one specimen, between 100 and 300 ng/mL in 27, and >or= 300 ng/mL in all others. EDPP concentrations were >or= 100 ng/mL in all specimens, suggesting that EDDP should be detectable in urine from compliant patients. Methadone and EDDP concentrations significantly increased with methadone dose and (in one participant with poor clinic attendance) significantly decreased following missed methadone doses. Nevertheless, variability was too great to permit estimation of methadone dose (or detect a single missed administration) from any single specimen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14516485     DOI: 10.1093/jat/27.6.332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  6 in total

Review 1.  Interpretation of oral fluid tests for drugs of abuse.

Authors:  Edward J Cone; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Sex differences in weight gain during medication-based treatment for opioid use disorder: A meta-analysis and retrospective analysis of clinical trial data.

Authors:  Peter Manza; Danielle Kroll; Katherine L McPherson; Allison Johnson; Evan Dennis; Lianne Hu; Betty Tai; Nora D Volkow
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.852

3.  Quantification of a methadone metabolite (EDDP) in urine: assessment of compliance.

Authors:  Michael E M Larson; Thomas M Richards
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2009-11-17

Review 4.  Gender differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of methadone substitution therapy.

Authors:  Manuela Graziani; Robert Nisticò
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Toward precision prescribing for methadone: Determinants of methadone deposition.

Authors:  Andrew H Talal; Yuxin Ding; Charles S Venuto; Lindsay M Chakan; Anthony McLeod; Arpan Dharia; Gene D Morse; Lawrence S Brown; Marianthi Markatou; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Pain Therapy Guided by Purpose and Perspective in Light of the Opioid Epidemic.

Authors:  Amie L Severino; Arash Shadfar; Joshua K Hakimian; Oliver Crane; Ganeev Singh; Keith Heinzerling; Wendy M Walwyn
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 4.157

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.