Literature DB >> 14516332

Chronic experiences with a single lead dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator system.

Michael Niehaus1, Marcos de Sousa, Gunnar Klein, Thomas Korte, Dietrich Pfeiffer, Thorsten Walles, Konstantinos Raymondos, Juergen Tebbenjohanns.   

Abstract

Monitoring of atrial rhythm in patients implanted with ICDs may improve accuracy in identifying supraventricular arrhythmias and, therefore, prevent inappropriate therapies. Since difficulties were found in dual chamber ICDs with separate leads, a new designed single lead dual chamber ICD system was tested. Twenty-five patients implanted with a Deikos A+ (single coil defibrillation lead with two atrial sensing rings combined with a dual chamber ICD with a high amplifying atrial channel) were tested. Atrial and ventricular signals were analyzed during sinus rhythm (SR) and sinus tachycardias (STs), atrial flutter and AF, and VT or VF. Follow-ups were performed after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after implantation. Analysis of EGM amplitudes of stored episodes revealed that atrial signals during atrial flutter (2.1 +/- 0.51 mV) were comparable to those of ST (2.2 +/- 0.5 mV). Atrial amplitudes during AF were significantly lower (0.81 +/- 0.5 mV, P<0.01). During VF atrial "sinus" signals (2 +/- 0.8 mV) were stable. Ventricular parameters did not differ from a standard ICD lead; defibrillation threshold was 11.4 +/- 4.5 J (16 patients). During intraoperative and prehospital discharge measurements, 97.1% of SR-P waves and 99.2% of atrial flutter waves were detected correctly. In AF 91.11% of atrial signals were detected. Analysis of 505 stored episodes showed that 96.8% of ST and 100% of atrial flutter and 100% of AF episodes have been classified correctly and no underdetection of VT/VF was found. The first experiences with the new VDD-ICD system show an increase of the specificity to detect ventricular tachycardias to a level comparable to dual chamber ICDs with two leads. The reliability of this system has to be proven in a prospective randomized study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14516332     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00299.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  2 in total

1.  The Dx-AF study: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing VDD-ICD to VVI-ICD in detecting sub-clinical atrial fibrillation in defibrillator patients.

Authors:  Mohammed Shurrab; Amir Janmohamed; Jean-François Sarrazin; Felix Ayala-Paredes; Marcio Sturmer; Randall Williams; Satish Toal; Chris Lane; Kevin E Thorpe; Jeff S Healey; Eugene Crystal
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Novel two-lead cardiac resynchronization therapy system provides equivalent CRT responses with less complications than a conventional three-lead system: Results from the QP ExCELs lead registry.

Authors:  Naushad A Shaik; Michael Drucker; Christopher Pierce; Gabor Z Duray; Shane Gillett; Crystal Miller; Camden Harrell; George Thomas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-06-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.