Literature DB >> 14516215

Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: the presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility.

Deborah K Eakin1, Thomas A Schreiber, Susan Sergent-Marshall.   

Abstract

The authors report 5 experiments investigating how exposure to misleading postevent information affects people's ability to remember details from a witnessed event. In each experiment the authors tested memory using the modified opposition test, which was designed to isolate retrieval-blocking effects. The findings indicate that retrieval blocking occurs regardless of whether the misleading information is presented before or after the witnessed event. In addition, when people are warned immediately about the presence of misleading information, they can counteract retrieval-blocking effects but only if the misinformation is relatively low in accessibility. The authors discuss the findings in terms of the retrieval-blocking hypothesis and a hypothetical suppression mechanism that can counteract retrieval-blocking effects in some circumstances. (c) 2003 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14516215     DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  10 in total

1.  Whatever gave you that idea? False memories following equivalence training: a behavioral account of the misinformation effect.

Authors:  Danna M Challies; Maree Hunt; Maryanne Garry; David N Harper
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Priming correct information reduces the misinformation effect.

Authors:  Leamarie T Gordon; Amy M Shapiro
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

3.  The promise of a cognitive perspective on jury deliberation.

Authors:  Jessica M Salerno; Shari Seidman Diamond
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

4.  Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Stephan Lewandowsky; David T W Tang
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

5.  Correcting false information in memory: manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction.

Authors:  Ullrich K H Ecker; Stephan Lewandowsky; Briony Swire; Darren Chang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

6.  Inoculating against eyewitness suggestibility via interpolated verbatim vs. gist testing.

Authors:  Ainat Pansky; Einat Tenenboim
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-01

7.  Evaluating suggestibility to additive and contradictory misinformation following explicit error detection in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Mark J Huff; Sharda Umanath
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2017-08-17

8.  Are witnesses able to avoid highly accessible misinformation? Examining the efficacy of different warnings for high and low accessibility postevent misinformation.

Authors:  John B Bulevich; Leamarie T Gordon; Gregory I Hughes; Ayanna K Thomas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-01-07

9.  Magic and memory: using conjuring to explore the effects of suggestion, social influence, and paranormal belief on eyewitness testimony for an ostensibly paranormal event.

Authors:  Krissy Wilson; Christopher C French
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-13

10.  Protecting memory from misinformation: Warnings modulate cortical reinstatement during memory retrieval.

Authors:  Jessica M Karanian; Nathaniel Rabb; Alia N Wulff; McKinzey G Torrance; Ayanna K Thomas; Elizabeth Race
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.