Literature DB >> 14516105

Multiobjective inverse planning for intensity modulated radiotherapy with constraint-free gradient-based optimization algorithms.

Michael Lahanas1, Eduard Schreibmann, Dimos Baltas.   

Abstract

We consider the behaviour of the limited memory L-BFGS algorithm as a representative constraint-free gradient-based algorithm which is used for multiobjective (MO) dose optimization for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Using a parameter transformation, the positivity constraint problem of negative beam fluences is entirely eliminated: a feature which to date has not been fully understood by all investigators. We analyse the global convergence properties of L-BFGS by searching for the existence and the influence of possible local minima. With a fast simulated annealing (FSA) algorithm we examine whether the L-BFGS solutions are globally Pareto optimal. The three examples used in our analysis are a brain tumour, a prostate tumour and a test case with a C-shaped PTV. In 1% of the optimizations global convergence is violated. A simple mechanism practically eliminates the influence of this failure and the obtained solutions are globally optimal. A single-objective dose optimization requires less than 4 s for 5400 parameters and 40000 sampling points. The elimination of the problem of negative beam fluences and the high computational speed permit constraint-free gradient-based optimization algorithms to be used for MO dose optimization. In this situation, a representative spectrum of possible solutions is obtained which contains information such as the trade-off between the objectives and range of dose values. Using simple decision making tools the best of all the possible solutions can be chosen. We perform an MO dose optimization for the three examples and compare the spectra of solutions, firstly using recommended critical dose values for the organs at risk and secondly, setting these dose values to zero.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14516105     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/17/308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  15 in total

1.  The use of a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm to increase flexibility in the search for better IMRT plans.

Authors:  Clay Holdsworth; Minsun Kim; Jay Liao; Mark Phillips
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Investigation of effective decision criteria for multiobjective optimization in IMRT.

Authors:  Clay Holdsworth; Robert D Stewart; Minsun Kim; Jay Liao; Mark H Phillips
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Ben J M Heijmen; Dirk Verellen; Andrew Nisbet
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Intelligent inverse treatment planning via deep reinforcement learning, a proof-of-principle study in high dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Chenyang Shen; Yesenia Gonzalez; Peter Klages; Nan Qin; Hyunuk Jung; Liyuan Chen; Dan Nguyen; Steve B Jiang; Xun Jia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Comparative analysis of Pareto surfaces in multi-criteria IMRT planning.

Authors:  K Teichert; P Süss; J I Serna; M Monz; K H Küfer; C Thieke
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  A hierarchical evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization in IMRT.

Authors:  Clay Holdsworth; Minsun Kim; Jay Liao; Mark H Phillips
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Optimization for Acceptable and Remaining-One Unacceptable Dose-Volume and Mean-Dose Constraint Planning.

Authors:  Ryosei Nakada; Omar M Abou Al-Ola; Tetsuya Yoshinaga
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Personalized treatment planning with a model of radiation therapy outcomes for use in multiobjective optimization of IMRT plans for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Wade P Smith; Minsun Kim; Clay Holdsworth; Jay Liao; Mark H Phillips
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  A detailed dosimetric comparison between manual and inverse plans in HDR intracavitary/interstitial cervical cancer brachytherapy.

Authors:  Petra Trnková; Dimos Baltas; Andreas Karabis; Markus Stock; Johannes Dimopoulos; Dietmar Georg; Richard Pötter; Christian Kirisits
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2011-01-14

10.  A comparison of three commercial IMRT treatment planning systems for selected paediatric cases.

Authors:  Ismail Eldesoky; Ehab M Attalla; Wael M Elshemey; Mohamed S Zaghloul
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.