Literature DB >> 14514989

Comparison of biochemical markers of bone turnover and bone mineral density between hip fracture and vertebral fracture.

Masaaki Takahashi1, Kenichi Naitou, Tsuyoshi Ohishi, Akira Nagano.   

Abstract

Bone density and the biochemical markers of bone turnover were compared between 26 hip-fracture patients and 41 vertebral-fracture patients after age adjustment to investigate whether or not type of osteoporosis differs between hip fracture and vertebral fracture. C-Terminal propepides of type I collagen (PIPC) was lower in hip fracture than vertebral fracture. The other bone formation markers (bone-specific alkaline phosphatase [ALP], osteocalcin) tended to be lower, and bone resorption markers (deoxypyridinoline, C-telopeptide crosslinking of type I collagen [CTX] tended to be higher in hip fracture compared to vertebral fracture. Mean of Z-scores of spine bone mineral density (BMD) in hip fracture and vertebral fracture were -0.461 and -0.919, respectively. Mean of Z-scores of femoral neck BMD in hip fracture and vertebral fracture were -0.994 and -0.361, respectively. All Z-scores were negative values, which means reduction of BMD compared to decade-matched controls. Z-scores of bone formation markers, such as bone-specific ALP, osteocalcin, and PIPC, were positive values in vertebral fracture, which means an increase against decade-matched controls, whereas those were negative values in hip fracture. Z-scores of bone resorption markers, such as deoxypyridinoline and CTX, were greater in hip fracture than in vertebral fracture. To express bone balance between formation and resorption in hip fracture and vertebral fracture, we calculated an uncoupling status index (USI) by the values of biochemical markers. USI of hip fracture showed a great negative value (-1.29), which indicates excess of bone resorption over formation, whereas that of vertebral fracture showed a small positive value (0.23). In conclusion, bone formation markers increase in vertebral fractures, but decrease in hip fracture. Bone resorption markers increase in both fracture, but greater increase in hip fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14514989     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:6:3:211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  5 in total

1.  Bone Turnover Markers Are Not Associated With Hip Fracture Risk: A Case-Control Study in the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Carolyn J Crandall; Sowmya Vasan; Andrea LaCroix; Meryl S LeBoff; Jane A Cauley; John A Robbins; Rebecca D Jackson; Douglas C Bauer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Quantifying the Balance Between Total Bone Formation and Total Bone Resorption: An Index of Net Bone Formation.

Authors:  Albert Shieh; Weijuan Han; Shinya Ishii; Gail A Greendale; Carolyn J Crandall; Arun S Karlamangla
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Bone Turnover in Vertebral Fractures: Does it Effect the Decision of Surgery?

Authors:  Zeki Serdar Ataizi; Hasan Emre Aydin; Evin Kocatürk; Ahmet Çerezci; İbrahim Özkan Alatas
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

4.  Analysis of Combined Indicators for Risk of Osteoporotic Hip Fracture in Elderly Women.

Authors:  Jin-Hui Zhao; Hui-Peng Shi; Da-Jun Jiang; Ling-Tian Wang; Sheng-Bao Chen; Wei-Tao Jia
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.071

5.  Poststroke hip fracture: prevalence, clinical characteristics, mineral-bone metabolism, outcomes, and gaps in prevention.

Authors:  Alexander Fisher; Wichat Srikusalanukul; Michael Davis; Paul Smith
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2013-09-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.