Literature DB >> 1451484

Sulphanilic acid: divergent results in the guinea pig maximization test and the local lymph node assay.

D A Basketter1, E W Scholes, M Cumberbatch, C D Evans, I Kimber.   

Abstract

The guinea pig maximization test (GPMT) has proven to be a valuable tool for the identification of the skin sensitization potential of chemicals. The method identifies a hazard which can lead in the EC to compulsory labelling of that chemical. In the present study, data on sulphanilic acid derived from the GPMT has been compared with results from a second guinea pig assay (the cumulative contact enhancement test) and the murine local lymph node assay, both of which require only topical application of chemical. Except for the GPMT, no test identified any sensitizing activity associated with exposure to sulphanilic acid. These latter results are consistent with the experience gained from substantial human exposure in an occupational setting and from which no cases of allergic contact dermatitis to sulphanilic acid have arisen over a 20-year period. In consequence, it is questioned which test protocol in practice has given the more accurate identification of sensitization hazard relevant to man.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1451484     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1992.tb03247.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  2 in total

1.  [Do sulfonamides still retain a place in dermatological therapy?].

Authors:  A Schnuch
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  A sensitive mouse lymph node assay with two application phases for detection of contact allergens.

Authors:  Y Ikarashi; T Tsuchiya; A Nakamura
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 5.153

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.