Literature DB >> 14514218

Evaluation of an auditory model for echo delay accuracy in wideband biosonar.

Mark I Sanderson1, Nicola Neretti, Nathan Intrator, James A Simmons.   

Abstract

In a psychophysical task with echoes that jitter in delay, big brown bats can detect changes as small as 10-20 ns at an echo signal-to-noise ratio of approximately 49 dB and 40 ns at approximately 36 dB. This performance is possible to achieve with ideal coherent processing of the wideband echoes, but it is widely assumed that the bat's peripheral auditory system is incapable of encoding signal waveforms to represent delay with the requisite precision or phase at ultrasonic frequencies. This assumption was examined by modeling inner-ear transduction with a bank of parallel bandpass filters followed by low-pass smoothing. Several versions of the filterbank model were tested to learn how the smoothing filters, which are the most critical parameter for controlling the coherence of the representation, affect replication of the bat's performance. When tested at a signal-to-noise ratio of 36 dB, the model achieved a delay acuity of 83 ns using a second-order smoothing filter with a cutoff frequency of 8 kHz. The same model achieved a delay acuity of 17 ns when tested with a signal-to-noise ratio of 50 dB. Jitter detection thresholds were an order of magnitude worse than the bat for fifth-order smoothing or for lower cutoff frequencies. Most surprising is that effectively coherent reception is possible with filter cutoff frequencies well below any of the ultrasonic frequencies contained in the bat's sonar sounds. The results suggest that only a modest rise in the frequency response of smoothing in the bat's inner ear can confer full phase sensitivity on subsequent processing and account for the bat's fine acuity or delay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14514218     DOI: 10.1121/1.1598195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

Review 1.  Complex echo classification by echo-locating bats: a review.

Authors:  Yossi Yovel; Matthias O Franz; Peter Stilz; Hans-Ulrich Schnitzler
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 2.  Bats: important reservoir hosts of emerging viruses.

Authors:  Charles H Calisher; James E Childs; Hume E Field; Kathryn V Holmes; Tony Schountz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  A comprehensive computational model of animal biosonar signal processing.

Authors:  Chen Ming; Stephanie Haro; Andrea Megela Simmons; James A Simmons
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Echo delay versus spectral cues for temporal hyperacuity in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M J Ferragamo; M I Sanderson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Delay accuracy in bat sonar is related to the reciprocal of normalized echo bandwidth, or Q.

Authors:  James A Simmons; Nicola Neretti; Nathan Intrator; Richard A Altes; Michael J Ferragamo; Mark I Sanderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A sensorimotor model shows why a spectral jamming avoidance response does not help bats deal with jamming.

Authors:  Omer Mazar; Yossi Yovel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 8.140

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.