Literature DB >> 14514212

Influences of tongue biomechanics on speech movements during the production of velar stop consonants: a modeling study.

Pascal Perrier1, Yohan Payan, Majid Zandipour, Joseph Perkell.   

Abstract

This study explores the following hypothesis: forward looping movements of the tongue that are observed in VCV sequences are due partly to the anatomical arrangement of the tongue muscles, how they are used to produce a velar closure, and how the tongue interacts with the palate during consonantal closure. The study uses an anatomically based two-dimensional biomechanical tongue model. Tissue elastic properties are accounted for in finite-element modeling, and movement is controlled by constant-rate control parameter shifts. Tongue raising and lowering movements are produced by the model mainly with the combined actions of the genioglossus, styloglossus, and hyoglossus. Simulations of V1CV2 movements were made, where C is a velar consonant and V is [a], [i], or [u]. Both vowels and consonants are specified in terms of targets, but for the consonant the target is virtual, and cannot be reached because it is beyond the surface of the palate. If V1 is the vowel [a] or [u], the resulting trajectory describes a movement that begins to loop forward before consonant closure and continues to slide along the palate during the closure. This pattern is very stable when moderate changes are made to the specification of the target consonant location and agrees with data published in the literature. If V1 is the vowel [i], looping patterns are also observed, but their orientation was quite sensitive to small changes in the location of the consonant target. These findings also agree with patterns of variability observed in measurements from human speakers, but they contradict data published by Houde [Ph.D. dissertation (1967)]. These observations support the idea that the biomechanical properties of the tongue could be the main factor responsible for the forward loops when V1 is a back vowel, regardless of whether V2 is a back vowel or a front vowel. In the [i] context it seems that additional factors have to be taken into consideration in order to explain the observations made on some speakers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14514212     DOI: 10.1121/1.1587737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  In Vivo Evaluation of the Mechanical and Viscoelastic Properties of the Rat Tongue.

Authors:  Emanuele Loro; Stephen H Wang; Richard J Schwab; Tejvir S Khurana
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Hearing tongue loops: perceptual sensitivity to acoustic signatures of articulatory dynamics.

Authors:  Hosung Nam; Christine Mooshammer; Khalil Iskarous; D H Whalen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  A model for production, perception, and acquisition of actions in face-to-face communication.

Authors:  Bernd J Kröger; Stefan Kopp; Anja Lowit
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-12-10

4.  Three speech sounds, one motor action: evidence for speech-motor disparity from English flap production.

Authors:  Donald Derrick; Ian Stavness; Bryan Gick
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Modeling the Role of Sensory Feedback in Speech Motor Control and Learning.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; John Houde
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Variability in muscle activation of simple speech motions: A biomechanical modeling approach.

Authors:  Negar M Harandi; Jonghye Woo; Maureen Stone; Rafeef Abugharbieh; Sidney Fels
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Subject-Specific Biomechanical Modelling of the Oropharynx: Towards Speech Production.

Authors: 
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis       Date:  2015-05-05

8.  Statistical Methods for Estimation of Direct and Differential Kinematics of the Vocal Tract.

Authors:  Adam Lammert; Louis Goldstein; Shrikanth Narayanan; Khalil Iskarous
Journal:  Speech Commun       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.017

9.  Explaining Coronal Reduction: Prosodic Structure and Articulatory Posture.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 1.759

10.  Lip kinematics in long and short stop and fricative consonants.

Authors:  Anders Löfqvist
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.