S E Andersen1, A B Pedersen, K F Bach. 1. Section of Clinical Pharmacology, H:S Bispebjerg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, DK-2400 Copenhagen, NV, Denmark. sea01@bbh.hosp.dk
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the extra information about patients' pre-admission medication that second drug interviews and general practitioners' (GP) drug lists add to routine medication histories. METHODS: The medication histories of 81 patients from two medicine wards were compared with information collected from second interviews and GP drug lists. A panel of clinicians assessed the potential clinical impact of any discrepancies. RESULTS: In nine cases (11% CI: 6-20%) the medication history, the second interview and the GP lists were identical. The interviews revealed extra information about 54 prescription drugs and 72 over-the-counter drugs (OTCs) in 56 (69% CI: 58-78%) cases. The GP lists added 74 prescription drugs and 26 OTCs to the medication histories in 57 (70% CI: 60-79%) cases. Discrepancies were not associated with age, gender or number of drugs in medication history. In 18% (CI: 10-30%) of the cases, the specialist panel ascribed potential clinical problems to missing drug information. CONCLUSIONS: Second interviews and GP lists reveal extra information about pre-admission medication in two-thirds of cases. Both procedures should be routinely performed to compile a more comprehensive basis for drug prescribing. This approach may mend the course of roughly one in five patients.
PURPOSE: To assess the extra information about patients' pre-admission medication that second drug interviews and general practitioners' (GP) drug lists add to routine medication histories. METHODS: The medication histories of 81 patients from two medicine wards were compared with information collected from second interviews and GP drug lists. A panel of clinicians assessed the potential clinical impact of any discrepancies. RESULTS: In nine cases (11% CI: 6-20%) the medication history, the second interview and the GP lists were identical. The interviews revealed extra information about 54 prescription drugs and 72 over-the-counter drugs (OTCs) in 56 (69% CI: 58-78%) cases. The GP lists added 74 prescription drugs and 26 OTCs to the medication histories in 57 (70% CI: 60-79%) cases. Discrepancies were not associated with age, gender or number of drugs in medication history. In 18% (CI: 10-30%) of the cases, the specialist panel ascribed potential clinical problems to missing drug information. CONCLUSIONS: Second interviews and GP lists reveal extra information about pre-admission medication in two-thirds of cases. Both procedures should be routinely performed to compile a more comprehensive basis for drug prescribing. This approach may mend the course of roughly one in five patients.
Authors: S Foss; J R Schmidt; T Andersen; J J Rasmussen; J Damsgaard; K Schaefer; L K Munck Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2003-12-19 Impact factor: 2.953