Literature DB >> 14513470

Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech.

Caroline F Rowland1, Julian M Pine, Elena V Lieven, Anna L Theakston.   

Abstract

Accounts that specify semantic and/or syntactic complexity as the primary determinant of the order in which children acquire particular words or grammatical constructions have been highly influential in the literature on question acquisition. One explanation of wh-question acquisition in particular suggests that the order in which English speaking children acquire wh-questions is determined by two interlocking linguistic factors; the syntactic function of the wh-word that heads the question and the semantic generality (or 'lightness') of the main verb (Bloom, Merkin & Wootten, 1982; Bloom, 1991). Another more recent view, however, is that acquisition is influenced by the relative frequency with which children hear particular wh-words and verbs in their input (e.g. Rowland & Pine, 2000). In the present study over 300 hours of naturalistic data from twelve two- to three-year-old children and their mothers were analysed in order to assess the relative contribution of complexity and input frequency to wh-question acquisition. The analyses revealed, first, that the acquisition order of wh-questions could be predicted successfully from the frequency with which particular wh-words and verbs occurred in the children's input and, second, that syntactic and semantic complexity did not reliably predict acquisition once input frequency was taken into account. These results suggest that the relationship between acquisition and complexity may be a by-product of the high correlation between complexity and the frequency with which mothers use particular wh-words and verbs. We interpret the results in terms of a constructivist view of language acquisition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14513470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Lang        ISSN: 0305-0009


  11 in total

1.  Improving question-asking initiations in young children with autism using pivotal response treatment.

Authors:  Robert L Koegel; Jessica L Bradshaw; Kristen Ashbaugh; Lynn Kern Koegel
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-04

2.  Input Training Matters in L2 Syntactic Representation Entrenchment: Evidence from a Follow-Up ERP Study.

Authors:  Taiping Deng; Baoguo Chen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-06

3.  Teaching Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder to Mand "Why?"

Authors:  Priya Patil; Tina M Sidener; Heather Pane; Sharon A Reeve; Anjalee Nirgudkar
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2021-01-14

4.  Children's accuracy in answering Why and How Come questions.

Authors:  Breanne E Wylie; Stacia N Stolzenberg; Angela D Evans
Journal:  Int J Behav Dev       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 5.  Father input and child vocabulary development: the importance of Wh questions and clarification requests.

Authors:  Kathryn A Leech; Virginia C Salo; Meredith L Rowe; Natasha J Cabrera
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 1.761

6.  Noun imageability facilitates the acquisition of plurals: survival analysis of plural emergence in children.

Authors:  Filip Smolík
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-08

7.  Negation, questions, and structure building in a homesign system.

Authors:  Amy Franklin; Anastasia Giannakidou; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-11-19

8.  The scope of usage-based theory.

Authors:  Paul Ibbotson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-08

Review 9.  The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition.

Authors:  Ben Ambridge; Evan Kidd; Caroline F Rowland; Anna L Theakston
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2015-03

10.  Eighteen-month-old infants represent nonlocal syntactic dependencies.

Authors:  Laurel Perkins; Jeffrey Lidz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.