Literature DB >> 14513080

Chiropractic manipulation for non-spinal pain--a systematic review.

Edzard Ernst1.   

Abstract

AIMS: Chiropractic manipulation is mostly used for spinal problems but, in an increasing number of cases, also for non-spinal conditions. This systematic review is aimed at critically evaluating the evidence for or against the effectiveness of this approach.
METHODS: Five electronic databases were searched for all randomised clinical trials of chiropractic manipulation as a treatment of non-spinal pain. They were evaluated according to standardised criteria.
RESULTS: Eight such studies were identified. They related to the following conditions: fibromyalgia, carpal tunnel syndrome, infantile colic, otitis media, dysmenorrhoea and chronic pelvic pain. Their methodological quality ranged from mostly poor to excellent. Their findings do not demonstrate that chiropractic manipulation is an effective therapy for any of these conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: Only very few randomised clinical trials of chiropractic manipulation as a treatment of non-spinal conditions exist. The claim that this approach is effective for such conditions is not based on data from rigorous clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14513080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Z Med J        ISSN: 0028-8446


  8 in total

Review 1.  Pain management in newborns.

Authors:  Richard W Hall; Kanwaljeet J S Anand
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.430

2.  Attitudes of clinicians at the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College towards the chiropractic management of non-musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  Jodi Parkinson; Jennifer Lau; Sandeep Kalirah; Brian J Gleberzon
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2011-06

3.  Effectiveness of manual therapies: the UK evidence report.

Authors:  Gert Bronfort; Mitch Haas; Roni Evans; Brent Leininger; Jay Triano
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2010-02-25

4.  Otitis media and spinal manipulative therapy: a literature review.

Authors:  Katherine A Pohlman; Monisa S Holton-Brown
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2012-09

Review 5.  A systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulation.

Authors:  E Ernst; P H Canter
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 18.000

6.  Attitudes towards chiropractic: an analysis of written comments from a survey of north american orthopaedic surgeons.

Authors:  Jason W Busse; Janey Jim; Craig Jacobs; Trung Ngo; Robert Rodine; David Torrance; Abhaya V Kulkarni; Brad Petrisor; Brian Drew; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2011-10-04

7.  Review conclusions by Ernst and Canter regarding spinal manipulation refuted.

Authors:  Gert Bronfort; Mitchell Haas; David Moher; Lex Bouter; Maurits van Tulder; John Triano; Willem J J Assendelft; Roni Evans; Simon Dagenais; Anthony Rosner
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2006-08-03

8.  Cerebrospinal fluid leak secondary to chiropractic manipulation.

Authors:  Nicholas A Kusnezov; Shamsha A Velani; Daniel C Lu
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-03-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.