Literature DB >> 1451240

Interposed abdominal compression-cardiopulmonary resuscitation and resuscitation outcome during asystole and electromechanical dissociation.

J B Sack1, M B Kesselbrenner, A Jarrad.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary perfusion pressure has been shown to be a significant determinant of return of spontaneous circulation from cardiac arrest during asystole and electromechanical dissociation. The addition of interposed abdominal compression to otherwise standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases coronary perfusion pressure in animal and human models. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Accordingly, we conducted a randomized prospective study of 143 consecutive patients experiencing cardiac arrest in a large university-affiliated teaching hospital in whom the initial arrest rhythm was asystole or electromechanical dissociation. Patients were randomized to receive either interposed abdominal compression-CPR or standard CPR. The two end points studied were return of spontaneous circulation and 24-hour survival. In addition, we studied the complications associated with interposed abdominal compression-CPR. Sixty-nine men and 74 women with a mean age of 64 years (range, 19-97 years) were studied. The overall rate of return of spontaneous circulation was 38%. Return of spontaneous circulation was significantly greater in the group receiving interposed abdominal compression-CPR compared with the group receiving standard CPR (49% versus 28%, p = 0.01). At 24 hours, there was a significantly greater number of patients alive in the experimental group than in the control group (33% versus 13%, p = 0.009). We found no complication directly related to the procedure of interposed abdominal compression in a small subset of patients who died and underwent necropsy.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the addition of interposed abdominal compression may be a useful adjunct to otherwise standard CPR that can improve resuscitation outcome of patients experiencing in-hospital cardiac arrest from asystole and electromechanical dissociation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1451240     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.86.6.1692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  5 in total

Review 1.  Part 7: CPR techniques and devices: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Diana M Cave; Raul J Gazmuri; Charles W Otto; Vinay M Nadkarni; Adam Cheng; Steven C Brooks; Mohamud Daya; Robert M Sutton; Richard Branson; Mary Fran Hazinski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2. 

Authors:  J P Nolan; C D Deakin; J Soar; B W Böttiger; G Smith; M Baubin; B Dirks; V Wenzel
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 0.826

Review 3.  In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Review.

Authors:  Lars W Andersen; Mathias J Holmberg; Katherine M Berg; Michael W Donnino; Asger Granfeldt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Effect of Interposed Abdominal Compression on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcomes; a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Atefeh Ghanbari Khanghah; Mohammad Taghi Moghadamnia; Latif Panahi; Somaye Pouy; Marjan Aghajani Nargesi; Ehsan Kazemnezhad Leyli
Journal:  Arch Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2022-07-16

5.  Interposed Abdominal Compression CPR for an Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Victim Failing Traditional CPR.

Authors:  Christian D McClung; Alexander J Anshus
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.