Literature DB >> 14512398

Quality of life in women with breast cancer during the first year after random assignment to adjuvant treatment with marrow-supported high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin or tailored therapy with Fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide: Scandinavian Breast Group Study 9401.

Yvonne Brandberg1, Helena Michelson, Bo Nilsson, Christina Bolund, Bjorn Erikstein, Paivi Hietanen, Stein Kaasa, Jonas Nilsson, Tom Wiklund, Nils Wilking, Jonas Bergh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare, in high-risk breast cancer patients, the effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of two adjuvant treatments. Treatments were compared at eight points during the first year after random assignment to treatment with tailored fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) therapy for nine courses versus induction FEC therapy for three courses followed by high-dose chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) supported by peripheral-blood stem cells. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From March 1994 to March 1998, 525 breast cancer patients (estimated relapse risk > 70% within 5 years with standard therapy) were included in the Scandinavian Breast Group 9401 study. HRQoL evaluation, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 and EORTC Breast Cancer Module-23, included 408 of 446 eligible patients in Finland, Norway, and Sweden.
RESULTS: Eighty-four percent to 95% of the patients completed questionnaires at eight points of assessment. Nostatistically significant overall differences were found between the tailored FEC group and the CTCb group for any of the HRQoL variables. Statistically significant differences over time were found for all HRQoL variables. HRQoL in the CTCb group demonstrated a steeper decrease, but a faster recovery than in the tailored FEC group. Emotional functioning improved with increased time from randomization. Higher levels of problems in body image and arm symptoms were reported in the tailored FEC group compared with the CTCb group. Sexual functioning and satisfaction were impaired during the study period.
CONCLUSION: Both treatments had a negative influence on HRQoL during the treatment period. Despite the aggressive therapies, the patient's HRQoL returned to levels found at inclusion on most variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14512398     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  11 in total

1.  Oncology Section EDGE Task Force on Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures for Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Shana Harrington; Jeannette Lee; Genevieve Colon; Meryl Alappattu
Journal:  Rehabil Oncol       Date:  2016-01

2.  Changes in sexual problems over time in women with and without early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Maria Pérez; Ying Liu; Mario Schootman; Rebecca L Aft; Kenneth B Schechtman; William E Gillanders; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Predictors of the course of quality of life during therapy in women with primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Achim Wöckel; L Schwentner; M Krockenberger; R Kreienberg; W Janni; M Wischnewsky; Kühn Thorsten; Flock Felix; Felberbaum Riccardo; M Blettner; S Singer
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Four weeks of daily assessments of anxiety, depression and activity compared to a point assessment with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

Authors:  Cecilia Arving; Bengt Glimelius; Yvonne Brandberg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Impact of menopausal symptoms on quality of life 6 months after systemic breast cancer treatment: results from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Survival Study.

Authors:  Tsogzolmaa Dorjgochoo; Asha Kallianpur; Ying Zheng; Kai Gu; Zhi Chen; Wei Zheng; Wei Lu; Xiao Ou Shu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Leucopenia and treatment efficacy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Zhen Su; Yan-Ping Mao; Pu-Yun OuYang; Jie Tang; Xiao-Wen Lan; Fang-Yun Xie
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Health-related quality of life and the predictive role of sense of coherence, spirituality and religious coping in a sample of Iranian women with breast cancer: a prospective study with comparative design.

Authors:  Camelia Rohani; Heidar-Ali Abedi; Ramesh Omranipour; Ann Langius-Eklöf
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Quality of life and mental health in breast cancer survivors compared with non-cancer controls: a study of patient-reported outcomes in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Helena Carreira; Rachael Williams; Harley Dempsey; Susannah Stanway; Liam Smeeth; Krishnan Bhaskaran
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 9.  Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007.

Authors:  Ali Montazeri
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-29

10.  Quality of life and quality-adjusted survival (Q-TWiST) in patients receiving dose-intensive or standard dose chemotherapy for high-risk primary breast cancer.

Authors:  J Bernhard; D Zahrieh; J J Zhang; G Martinelli; R Basser; C Hürny; J F Forbes; S Aebi; W Yeo; B Thürlimann; M D Green; M Colleoni; R D Gelber; M Castiglione-Gertsch; K N Price; A Goldhirsch; A S Coates
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.