Literature DB >> 14512345

Recognizing the fold of a protein structure.

Andrew Harrison1, Frances Pearl, Ian Sillitoe, Tim Slidel, Richard Mott, Janet Thornton, Christine Orengo.   

Abstract

This paper reports a graph-theoretic program, GRATH, that rapidly, and accurately, matches a novel structure against a library of domain structures to find the most similar ones. GRATH generates distributions of scores by comparing the novel domain against the different types of folds that have been classified previously in the CATH database of structural domains. GRATH uses a measure of similarity that details the geometric information, number of secondary structures and number of residues within secondary structures, that any two protein structures share. Although GRATH builds on well established approaches for secondary structure comparison, a novel scoring scheme has been introduced to allow ranking of any matches identified by the algorithm. More importantly, we have benchmarked the algorithm using a large dataset of 1702 non-redundant structures from the CATH database which have already been classified into fold groups, with manual validation. This has facilitated introduction of further constraints, optimization of parameters and identification of reliable thresholds for fold identification. Following these benchmarking trials, the correct fold can be identified with the top score with a frequency of 90%. It is identified within the ten most likely assignments with a frequency of 98%. GRATH has been implemented to use via a server (http://www.biochem.ucl.ac.uk/cgi-bin/cath/Grath.pl). GRATH's speed and accuracy means that it can be used as a reliable front-end filter for the more accurate, but computationally expensive, residue based structure comparison algorithm SSAP, currently used to classify domain structures in the CATH database. With an increasing number of structures being solved by the structural genomics initiatives, the GRATH server also provides an essential resource for determining whether newly determined structures are related to any known structures from which functional properties may be inferred.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14512345     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  26 in total

1.  1.6 A crystal structure of YteR protein from Bacillus subtilis, a predicted lyase.

Authors:  R Zhang; T Minh; L Lezondra; S Korolev; S F Moy; F Collart; A Joachimiak
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-08-15

2.  Assessing strategies for improved superfamily recognition.

Authors:  Ian Sillitoe; Mark Dibley; James Bray; Sarah Addou; Christine Orengo
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Evaluation of the information content in infrared spectra for protein secondary structure determination.

Authors:  Erik Goormaghtigh; Jean-Marie Ruysschaert; Vincent Raussens
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Structural genomics is the largest contributor of novel structural leverage.

Authors:  Rajesh Nair; Jinfeng Liu; Ta-Tsen Soong; Thomas B Acton; John K Everett; Andrei Kouranov; Andras Fiser; Adam Godzik; Lukasz Jaroszewski; Christine Orengo; Gaetano T Montelione; Burkhard Rost
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2009-02-05

5.  INTEGRATING COMPUTATIONAL PROTEIN FUNCTION PREDICTION INTO DRUG DISCOVERY INITIATIVES.

Authors:  Marianne A Grant
Journal:  Drug Dev Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.360

6.  The CATH hierarchy revisited-structural divergence in domain superfamilies and the continuity of fold space.

Authors:  Alison Cuff; Oliver C Redfern; Lesley Greene; Ian Sillitoe; Tony Lewis; Mark Dibley; Adam Reid; Frances Pearl; Tim Dallman; Annabel Todd; Richard Garratt; Janet Thornton; Christine Orengo
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  An optimized TOPS+ comparison method for enhanced TOPS models.

Authors:  Mallika Veeramalai; David Gilbert; Gabriel Valiente
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Alignment-free local structural search by writhe decomposition.

Authors:  Degui Zhi; Maxim Shatsky; Steven E Brenner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Homology modeling and structural comparison of leucine rich repeats of Toll like receptors 1-10 of ruminants.

Authors:  Anandan Swathi; Gopal Dhinakar Raj; Angamuthu Raja; Krishnaswamy Gopalan Tirumurugaan
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Structure based function prediction of proteins using fragment library frequency vectors.

Authors:  Akshay Yadav; Valadi Krishnamoorthy Jayaraman
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2012-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.