OBJECTIVES: To study whether proactive educational counselling, in addition to routine clinical care, reduces psychological morbidity and improves quality of life and client satisfaction among women who suffer suboptimal outcomes during childbirth. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial. SETTING:Obstetric unit of a tertiary teaching hospital. POPULATION: Women who had unexpected antenatal, intrapartum or postpartum events leading to suboptimal outcomes during pregnancy and childbirth. INTERVENTION: Educational counselling provided by a trained research nurse in the postnatal ward after delivery. Women in the control group received routine clinical care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the General Health Questionnaire and the Clinical Global Impression (before and after counselling, at six weeks and six months post-delivery) and the World Health Organisation Quality of Life scale (WHO-QOL) (at six weeks and six months post-delivery). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in psychological morbidity, quality of life or client satisfaction between the counselling group and the control group. Participants who underwent elective caesarean section and who had theeducational counselling had significantly lower depression scores [mean 2.6 (SD 2.6)] compared with those receiving routine care [mean 3.9 (SD 3.2)]. On the other hand, educational counselling may have deleterious effect to women's quality of life in those who had instrumental delivery. Participants allocated to the counselling group had a lower mean score 68 (SD 13) in the physical domain of WHO-QOL than those in the intervention group 74 (SD 13). CONCLUSION:Educational counselling, given on top of routine clinical care, does not give additional beneficial effects on the psychological wellbeing and quality of life of women who encountered suboptimal outcomes during pregnancy.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To study whether proactive educational counselling, in addition to routine clinical care, reduces psychological morbidity and improves quality of life and client satisfaction among women who suffer suboptimal outcomes during childbirth. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Obstetric unit of a tertiary teaching hospital. POPULATION: Women who had unexpected antenatal, intrapartum or postpartum events leading to suboptimal outcomes during pregnancy and childbirth. INTERVENTION: Educational counselling provided by a trained research nurse in the postnatal ward after delivery. Women in the control group received routine clinical care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the General Health Questionnaire and the Clinical Global Impression (before and after counselling, at six weeks and six months post-delivery) and the World Health Organisation Quality of Life scale (WHO-QOL) (at six weeks and six months post-delivery). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in psychological morbidity, quality of life or client satisfaction between the counselling group and the control group. Participants who underwent elective caesarean section and who had the educational counselling had significantly lower depression scores [mean 2.6 (SD 2.6)] compared with those receiving routine care [mean 3.9 (SD 3.2)]. On the other hand, educational counselling may have deleterious effect to women's quality of life in those who had instrumental delivery. Participants allocated to the counselling group had a lower mean score 68 (SD 13) in the physical domain of WHO-QOL than those in the intervention group 74 (SD 13). CONCLUSION: Educational counselling, given on top of routine clinical care, does not give additional beneficial effects on the psychological wellbeing and quality of life of women who encountered suboptimal outcomes during pregnancy.
Authors: Beth A Lewis; Dwenda K Gjerdingen; Melissa D Avery; Hongfei Guo; John R Sirard; Amanda R Bonikowske; Bess H Marcus Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-08-05 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Elizabeth Werner; Maia Miller; Lauren M Osborne; Sierra Kuzava; Catherine Monk Journal: Arch Womens Ment Health Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Anne Marie Chomat; Aura Isabel Menchú; Neil Andersson; Manuel Ramirez-Zea; Duncan Pedersen; Alexandra Bleile; Paola Letona; Ricardo Araya Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 2.809