AIMS: Soft tissue sarcomas are rare and heterogeneous tumours only occasionally seen by most individual clinicians. Early recognition, appropriate referral and timely investigations markedly improve outcomes. Our aim was to retrospectively assess the referral patterns, investigation, surgery and outcomes of patients with soft tissue sarcoma in the Trent region of the UK. METHODS: Two hundred and four patients with soft tissue sarcoma registered with the Trent Cancer Registry in 1995-1997 were first studied. Clinical details, tumour characteristics, presentation, management and follow-up were recorded from the case notes and analysed.A further group of 40 patients referred to a single cancer centre in 1999 were audited to establish whether there had been any improvements/changes over the 2 years, since the completion of the first audit. RESULTS: In the first audit, 49.5% were first referred to general surgeons and 16% to orthopaedic surgeons. Only 15% of patients fit for surgery were referred to a surgeon with a specialist sarcoma interest prior to definitive exploration. Of the deep tumours, 64% had a preoperative biopsy and only 68% had a scan before biopsy or definitive surgery. Tumour grade, completeness of excision and site of the sarcoma influenced survival. The second audit performed on patients treated in 1999 showed only a marginal improvement in management when compared to the first audit.
AIMS: Soft tissue sarcomas are rare and heterogeneous tumours only occasionally seen by most individual clinicians. Early recognition, appropriate referral and timely investigations markedly improve outcomes. Our aim was to retrospectively assess the referral patterns, investigation, surgery and outcomes of patients with soft tissue sarcoma in the Trent region of the UK. METHODS: Two hundred and four patients with soft tissue sarcoma registered with the Trent Cancer Registry in 1995-1997 were first studied. Clinical details, tumour characteristics, presentation, management and follow-up were recorded from the case notes and analysed.A further group of 40 patients referred to a single cancer centre in 1999 were audited to establish whether there had been any improvements/changes over the 2 years, since the completion of the first audit. RESULTS: In the first audit, 49.5% were first referred to general surgeons and 16% to orthopaedic surgeons. Only 15% of patients fit for surgery were referred to a surgeon with a specialist sarcoma interest prior to definitive exploration. Of the deep tumours, 64% had a preoperative biopsy and only 68% had a scan before biopsy or definitive surgery. Tumour grade, completeness of excision and site of the sarcoma influenced survival. The second audit performed on patients treated in 1999 showed only a marginal improvement in management when compared to the first audit.
Authors: Harald J Hoekstra; Rick L M Haas; Cornelis Verhoef; Albert J H Suurmeijer; Carla S P van Rijswijk; Ben G H Bongers; Winette T van der Graaf; Vincent K Y Ho Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-07-26 Impact factor: 5.344