PURPOSE: To study the effect of environmental toxins on the ocular surface in persons travelling through highly polluted areas of the metropolis of Delhi. METHODS: A total of 500 apparently healthy volunteers recruited from the metropolis of Delhi were examined to establish the frequency of ocular surface disorders. All subjects underwent a slit-lamp examination, tear break-up time (BUT) test, Rose Bengal test, Schirmer's test and tear lysozyme level test. RESULTS: Subjects in the study group had significantly higher levels of ophthalmic symptoms compared to the control group. In all, 105 (42%) and 125 (50%) subjects in the study group compared to 50 (20%) and 65 (26%) in the control group complained of redness and irritation (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in visual acuity (VA) between the two groups, with best corrected VA being 6/9 or better in 92% of the study group and 96% of the control group. The average (+/-standard deviation) Schirmer's test result was 13.42+/-6.67 mm in the study group compared to 15.95+/-6.14 mm in the control group. This difference was statistically significant. The BUT was also significantly lower in the study group (12.97+/-6.12 seconds) compared to the control group (19.23+/-5.70 seconds) (p < 0.001). The Rose Bengal test and tear lysozyme activity did not show any significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: According to our study, environmental conditions appear to have a very significant effect on the ocular surface. There were very high levels of subclinical ocular surface changes among persons travelling in highly polluted areas.
PURPOSE: To study the effect of environmental toxins on the ocular surface in persons travelling through highly polluted areas of the metropolis of Delhi. METHODS: A total of 500 apparently healthy volunteers recruited from the metropolis of Delhi were examined to establish the frequency of ocular surface disorders. All subjects underwent a slit-lamp examination, tear break-up time (BUT) test, Rose Bengal test, Schirmer's test and tear lysozyme level test. RESULTS: Subjects in the study group had significantly higher levels of ophthalmic symptoms compared to the control group. In all, 105 (42%) and 125 (50%) subjects in the study group compared to 50 (20%) and 65 (26%) in the control group complained of redness and irritation (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in visual acuity (VA) between the two groups, with best corrected VA being 6/9 or better in 92% of the study group and 96% of the control group. The average (+/-standard deviation) Schirmer's test result was 13.42+/-6.67 mm in the study group compared to 15.95+/-6.14 mm in the control group. This difference was statistically significant. The BUT was also significantly lower in the study group (12.97+/-6.12 seconds) compared to the control group (19.23+/-5.70 seconds) (p < 0.001). The Rose Bengal test and tear lysozyme activity did not show any significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: According to our study, environmental conditions appear to have a very significant effect on the ocular surface. There were very high levels of subclinical ocular surface changes among persons travelling in highly polluted areas.
Authors: Yasmina Mohammed Abd-Elhakim; Nabela I El Sharkawy; Khlood M El Bohy; Mohammed Gomaa; Sarah Haseeb Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Jennifer Borcherding; Jonas Baltrusaitis; Haihan Chen; Larissa Stebounova; Chia-Ming Wu; Gayan Rubasinghege; Imali A Mudunkotuwa; Juan Carlos Caraballo; Joseph Zabner; Vicki H Grassian; Alejandro P Comellas Journal: Environ Sci Nano Date: 2014-04
Authors: Yasmina M Abd-Elhakim; Khlood M El Bohi; Nabela I El Sharkawy; Manar A Ghali; Sarah Haseeb Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 4.223
Authors: Lucía Echevarría-Lucas; José Mᵃ Senciales-González; María Eloísa Medialdea-Hurtado; Jesús Rodrigo-Comino Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Chi-Jung Chung; Ning-Yi Hsia; Chih-Da Wu; Ting-Ju Lai; Jein-Wen Chen; Hui-Tsung Hsu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-26 Impact factor: 3.390