Literature DB >> 14510325

The multiple negative randomized controlled trials in perinatology--why?

Marya Strand1, Alan H Jobe.   

Abstract

Many of the multicenter trials in perinatal medicine have been negative in that they have shown no benefit for the intervention relative to the control. Although a negative trial can improve patient care by the avoidance of an unnecessary treatment, most trials are designed with the intent of the intervention improving outcomes. We selectively reviewed a number of recent trials in order to identify why the trials were negative. In general, the preliminary information on which the trials were based, which was a small trial or a meta-analysis of multiple small trials, was not robust or predictive. The weak preliminary information together with limited numbers of patients, problematic primary outcomes and a poor understanding of the biology of neonatal diseases has limited the ability to reliably design trials with positive outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14510325     DOI: 10.1016/s0146-0005(03)00042-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Perinatol        ISSN: 0146-0005            Impact factor:   3.300


  2 in total

1.  The Pediatric Heart Network: a primer for the conduct of multicenter studies in children with congenital and acquired heart disease.

Authors:  L Mahony; L A Sleeper; P A W Anderson; W M Gersony; B W McCrindle; L L Minich; J W Newburger; J P Saul; V L Vetter; G D Pearson
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 2.  A systematic review of randomized controlled trials for the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants.

Authors:  K S Beam; S Aliaga; S K Ahlfeld; M Cohen-Wolkowiez; P B Smith; M M Laughon
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.225

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.