Literature DB >> 14510324

Longitudinal multicenter follow-up of high-risk infants: why, who, when, and what to assess.

Betty R Vohr1, Michael O'Shea, Linda L Wright.   

Abstract

This article reviews experience with longitudinal follow-up of high-risk infants in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Neonatal Research Network. In 1993, the Network initiated a research protocol to provide longitudinal follow-up of infants with birth weight less than 1001 g and infants with higher birth weights who participated in certain Network randomized trials. Infants are assessed at 18 to 22 months corrected age (corrected for degree of prematurity) using measures of the infant's health, growth, neuromotor, and early cognitive functioning, language, behavior, and family resources. Data from these assessments have been used to investigate potentially modifiable risk factors for cerebral palsy and delayed early cognitive functioning and to evaluate the risks and benefits of interventions assessed in randomized trials. The Network's experience thus far suggests that longitudinal follow-up can provide valuable information about treatments given to fetuses and neonates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14510324     DOI: 10.1016/s0146-0005(03)00045-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Perinatol        ISSN: 0146-0005            Impact factor:   3.300


  15 in total

Review 1.  Developmental Support for Infants With Genetic Disorders.

Authors:  Monica H Wojcik; Jane E Stewart; Susan E Waisbren; Jonathan S Litt
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Trends and challenges in United States neonatal intensive care units follow-up clinics.

Authors:  K Bockli; B Andrews; M Pellerite; W Meadow
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 3.  Neonatal follow-up program: Where do we stand?

Authors:  Badr H Sobaih
Journal:  Sudan J Paediatr       Date:  2012

Review 4.  Exposure to maternal voice in preterm infants: a review.

Authors:  Charlene Krueger
Journal:  Adv Neonatal Care       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.968

5.  Neonatal heart rate variability and intraventricular hemorrhage: a case study.

Authors:  Charlene A Krueger; Elizabeth A Gyland; Douglas W Theriaque
Journal:  Pediatr Nurs       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

Review 6.  Newborn intensive care survivors: a review and a plan for collaboration in Texas.

Authors:  Alice Gong; Yvette R Johnson; Judith Livingston; Kathleen Matula; Andrea F Duncan
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2015-10-19

7.  Evaluation of 1-year-old children development in Isfahan City and its effective factors using ages and stages questionnaire, in 2014.

Authors:  Mehri Rejali; Soheila Pahlavni; Akbar Hassanzadeh
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2017-06-05

8.  Impact of a child with congenital anomalies on parents (ICCAP) questionnaire; a psychometric analysis.

Authors:  Petra Mazer; Saskia J Gischler; Hans M Koot; Dick Tibboel; Monique van Dijk; Hugo J Duivenvoorden
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-11-23       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 9.  Outcome of paediatric intensive care survivors.

Authors:  Hendrika Knoester; Martha A Grootenhuis; Albert P Bos
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Development of Children in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Firoozeh Sajedi; Mahbobeh Ahmadi Doulabi; Roshanak Vameghi; Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban; Mohammad Ali Mazaheri; Zohreh Mahmodi; Erfan Ghasemi
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2016-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.