Literature DB >> 14509332

Reliability of physical examination as a predictor of vascular injury after penetrating neck trauma.

Rafael E Azuaje1, Lewis E Jacobson, Jennifer Glover, Gerardo A Gomez, George H Rodman, Thomas A Broadie, Clark J Simons, H Scott Bjerke.   

Abstract

The policy of routine angiography (ANG) for all penetrating neck wounds results in a high rate of negative studies. The medical records of all patients who presented to Wishard Memorial Hospital and Methodist Hospital of Indiana with penetrating injuries to the neck from January 1992 to April 2001 were reviewed. All patients who were hemodynamically stable underwent four-vessel ANG to evaluate for vascular injury irrespective of findings on physical examination (PE). A total of 216 patients sustained penetrating neck injuries. Patients were divided according to positive or negative PE findings and the results of ANG. Of the 63 patients with a positive PE, 40 (68%) also had a positive ANG finding. Of the 89 patients with negative PE, only 3 had a positive ANG and none of these injuries required operative repair. PE therefore had a 93 per cent sensitivity (SEN) and a 97 per cent negative predictive value (NPV) for predicting the results of ANG. The SEN and NPV of PE for detecting vascular injuries requiring operative repair were both 100 per cent. In this series, no patient with a negative PE had a vascular injury that required operative repair, irrespective of zone of injury. Routine ANG may therefore be unnecessary for patients with penetrating neck injuries and a negative PE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14509332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  8 in total

Review 1.  Penetrating injuries of the neck and the increasing role of CTA.

Authors:  Felipe Múnera; Jorge A Soto; Diego Nunez
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-05-27

Review 2.  Penetrating nontorso trauma: the head and the neck.

Authors:  Chad G Ball
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Penetrating Cervical Trauma. "Current Concepts in Penetrating Trauma", IATSIC Symposium, International Surgical Society, Helsinki, Finland, August 25-29, 2013.

Authors:  David V Feliciano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Analysis of 203 patients with penetrating neck injuries.

Authors:  Max Thoma; Pradeep H Navsaria; Sorin Edu; Andrew J Nicol
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Endovascular Considerations in Traumatic Injury of the Carotid and Vertebral Arteries.

Authors:  Ananth K Vellimana; Jayson Lavie; Arindam Rano Chatterjee
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 1.513

6.  Changing incidence and management of penetrating neck injuries in the South East London trauma centre.

Authors:  R Harris; C Olding; C Lacey; R Bentley; K M Schulte; D Lewis; N Kandasamy; R Oakley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Stab injury to the preauricular region with laceration of the external carotid artery without involvement of the facial nerve: a case report.

Authors:  Diogo Casal; Giovanni Pelliccia; Diogo Pais; Diogo Carrola-Gomes; Maria Angélica-Almeida; José Videira-Castro; João Goyri-O'Neill
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2017-07-29

8.  Value of clinical examination in the assessment of penetrating neck injuries: a retrospective study of diagnostic accuracy test.

Authors:  Andrés Isaza-Restrepo; Julián Andrés Quintero-Contreras; Jorge Escobar-DiazGranados; Ángela María Ruiz-Sternberg
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2020-03-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.