Literature DB >> 14508648

[Ulnar head prosthesis].

J V Schoonhoven1, T J Herbert, D L Fernandez, K-J Prommersberger, H Krimmer.   

Abstract

The ulnar head prosthesis has been the subject of a prospective multicenter-study since 1995. Until 2000, it has been used in 57 patients by the study group. In 35 patients, the indication was painful instability of the distal end of the ulna following previous resection arthroplasties, and in 22 patients it was painful arthritis of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). The mean follow-up was 38 months. Pronation increased from a preoperative mean of 63 degrees to a postoperative value of 78 degrees, while supination increased from 43 degrees to 76 degrees. Grip strength improved from a preoperative mean of 51% to a postoperative mean of 77% of the opposite limb. Pain, measured on the verbal pain scale (1-4), was reduced remarkably from a preoperative mean level of 3.6 to a postoperative mean of 1.7. Patient' satisfaction was evaluated using the visual analog scale (0-10) and improved from a preoperative mean of 2.1 to a postoperative mean of 7.9. With one exception of loosening, we consistently found bony integration of the shaft of the prosthesis. Stability of the DRUJ was achieved in all but three patients. This method has given reliable and excellent results as a salvage procedure for failed resection arthroplasties of the DRUJ with painful instability of the distal end of the ulna. We consider the method an alternative treatment option for the arthritically destroyed DRUJ. Sufficient soft tissue to stabilise the prosthesis is needed to successfully reconstruct the DRUJ.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14508648     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-003-0522-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  10 in total

1.  [Disorders of the distal radioulnar joint following fractures of the distal end of the radius].

Authors:  K-J Prommersberger; J van Schoonhoven
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Periprosthetic fracture of the ulna-a case report.

Authors:  David Bauer; Andreas Schweizer; Ladislav Nagy
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2015-05

3.  [Reconstruction of the distal radioulnar joint using the Herbert ulnar head prosthesis].

Authors:  M Mühldorfer-Fodor; T Pillukat; T Pausch; K-J Prommersberger; J van Schoonhoven
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  [The role of endoprostheses in the scope of hand surgery. Endoprostheses vs. traditional surgical procedures].

Authors:  W Daecke; N Streich; S Schneider; A-K Martini
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  [Corrective surgery after fractures of the distal radius].

Authors:  K-J Prommersberger; J van Schoonhoven
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  [Salvage operations and their differential indication for the distal radioulnar joint].

Authors:  J Van Schoonhoven; U Lanz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  [Treatment of the ulnar impingement syndrome in the distal radioulnar joint].

Authors:  H Krimmer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty with implants: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maurizio Calcagni; Thomas Giesen
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

9.  Distal Radioulnar Joint Arthroplasty with a Scheker Prosthesis.

Authors:  Roberta M Strigel; Michael L Richardson
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-06

10.  INDICATIONS FOR DISTAL RADIOULNAR ARTHROPLASTY: REPORT ON THREE CLINICAL CASES.

Authors:  Cláudia Santos; Alexandre Pereira; Marco Sousa; Miguel Trigeuiros; César Silva
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.