C Raina Elley1, Ngaire M Kerse, Bruce Arroll. 1. Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, P.O. Box 92019, Auckland, New Zealand. c.elley@auckland.ac.nz
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The question of whether the public health issue of physical inactivity should be addressed in primary health care is a controversial matter. METHODS: Baseline cross-sectional analysis of a physician-based physical activity intervention trial involving sedentary adults was undertaken within 42 rural and urban family practices in New Zealand to examine self-reported levels of physical activity and cardiovascular risk factors. A self-administered single question about physical activity was used to screen 40- to 79-year-old patients from waiting rooms for physical inactivity. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of the screening question was 81%. Participation rates for the study were high, including 74% of family physicians (n = 117) in the region. Eighty-eight percent of consecutive patients in the age group agreed to be screened and 46% were identified as sedentary. Of those eligible, 66% (n = 878) agreed to participate in a study involving a lifestyle intervention from their family physician. Blood pressure and BMI were significantly greater than that in the general population. There were high rates of hypertension (52%), diabetes (10.5%), obesity (43%), previous cardiovascular disease (19%), and risk factors for cardiovascular disease (93%). Decreasing total energy expenditure was associated with increasing cardiovascular risk (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sedentary adults in primary care represent a high cardiovascular risk population. Screening for inactivity in primary care is effective and efficient. Two-thirds of sedentary adults agreed to receive a lifestyle intervention from their family physician.
BACKGROUND: The question of whether the public health issue of physical inactivity should be addressed in primary health care is a controversial matter. METHODS: Baseline cross-sectional analysis of a physician-based physical activity intervention trial involving sedentary adults was undertaken within 42 rural and urban family practices in New Zealand to examine self-reported levels of physical activity and cardiovascular risk factors. A self-administered single question about physical activity was used to screen 40- to 79-year-old patients from waiting rooms for physical inactivity. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of the screening question was 81%. Participation rates for the study were high, including 74% of family physicians (n = 117) in the region. Eighty-eight percent of consecutive patients in the age group agreed to be screened and 46% were identified as sedentary. Of those eligible, 66% (n = 878) agreed to participate in a study involving a lifestyle intervention from their family physician. Blood pressure and BMI were significantly greater than that in the general population. There were high rates of hypertension (52%), diabetes (10.5%), obesity (43%), previous cardiovascular disease (19%), and risk factors for cardiovascular disease (93%). Decreasing total energy expenditure was associated with increasing cardiovascular risk (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Sedentary adults in primary care represent a high cardiovascular risk population. Screening for inactivity in primary care is effective and efficient. Two-thirds of sedentary adults agreed to receive a lifestyle intervention from their family physician.
Authors: Felicity Goodyear-Smith; Nicole M Coupe; Bruce Arroll; C Raina Elley; Sean Sullivan; Anne-Thea McGill Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Jonathan A Mitchell; Calum Mattocks; Andy R Ness; Sam D Leary; Russell R Pate; Marsha Dowda; Steven N Blair; Chris Riddoch Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2009-02-26 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Lesley D Gillespie; M Clare Robertson; William J Gillespie; Catherine Sherrington; Simon Gates; Lindy M Clemson; Sarah E Lamb Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2012-09-12
Authors: Sally B Rose; Beverley A Lawton; C Raina Elley; Anthony C Dowell; Anna J Fenton Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2007-07-23 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Simon J Sebire; Mark J Edwards; Rona Campbell; Russell Jago; Ruth Kipping; Kathryn Banfield; Keeley Tomkinson; Kirsty Garfield; Ronan A Lyons; Joanne Simon; Peter S Blair; William Hollingworth Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2016-01-15