Literature DB >> 14506669

Cytopathological grading, as a predictor of histopathological grade, in ductal carcinoma (NOS) of breast, on air-dried Diff-Quik smears.

M Z Khan1, A Haleem, H Al Hassani, H Kfoury.   

Abstract

Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a widely practiced technique in the diagnosis of breast carcinoma, and it is the only diagnostic procedure performed before definitive treatment, at most institutions. While the histological grading of breast carcinoma has become routine in many centers worldwide, the cytopathological grading of breast carcinoma is not commonly used. Grading of breast carcinoma, while the tumor is still in vivo, would be the most ideal and desirable situation, as it would be helpful in the selection of patients for appropriate therapy. The objective of this study, therefore, was to devise a simple system for grading breast carcinoma, based on the cytological features alone. We reviewed 125 cases of breast carcinoma retrospectively, which were initially diagnosed by FNAC, with subsequent histopathological confirmation. These included 105 ductal, 6 lobular, 2 tubular, 1 papillary, and 1 medullary carcinoma. There was 1 ductal carcinoma in situ. Nine cases were rendered insufficient for grading. Thus 105 cases of ductal carcinoma (NOS) were evaluated for final cytological grading. Air-dried Diff-Quik-stained smears were reviewed at least twice independently by four histopathologists and were then compared with the original histological grades. Six cytological features used for grading were found to be statistically significant: cellular pleomorphism, nuclear size, nuclear margin, nucleoli, naked tumor nuclei, and mitoses. A scoring system based on these six essential parameters was used, to classify ductal carcinoma into three cytological grades, which showed close correlation with the established histological grades. In addition, two less consistent, but still important, features were the presence or absence of necrosis and stromal invasion. Another six parameters, including smear cellularity, degree of cell dispersion or clustering, lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, presence of tubular structures, cytoplasmic appearance of the tumor cells, and smear background, were not statistically significant. However, these additional parameters were found helpful in assigning the correct grade, in cases with borderline scores. The concordance rate with histology was 100% for grade 1, 98% for grade 2, and 93% for grade 3. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14506669     DOI: 10.1002/dc.10285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol        ISSN: 1097-0339            Impact factor:   1.582


  14 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of six cytological grading systems in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Kaushik Saha; Gargi Raychaudhuri; Bitan Kuamr Chattopadhyay; Indranil Das
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Cytological grading of breast cancers and comparative evaluation of two grading systems.

Authors:  Farooq Ahmed Wani; Subhash Bhardwaj; Dinesh Kumar; Pervez Katoch
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Comparative evaluation of the modified Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grading system on breast carcinoma aspirates and histopathology.

Authors:  Cherry Bansal; U S Singh; Sanjeev Misra; Kiran Lata Sharma; Vandana Tiwari; A N Srivastava
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 2.091

4.  Evaluation of grading and hormone receptor immunostaining on fine needle aspirates in carcinoma breast.

Authors:  Uma Handa; Amit Kumar; Reetu Kundu; Usha Dalal; Harsh Mohan
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Comparative evaluation of various cytomorphological grading systems in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  P Arul; Suresh Masilamani
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

6.  Diagnostic efficacy of smear cytology and Robinson's cytological grading of canine mammary tumors with respect to histopathology, cytomorphometry, metastases and overall survival.

Authors:  Izabella Dolka; Michał Czopowicz; Anna Gruk-Jurka; Agata Wojtkowska; Rafał Sapierzyński; Piotr Jurka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Role of Nuclear Morphometry in Breast Cancer and its Correlation with Cytomorphological Grading of Breast Cancer: A Study of 64 Cases.

Authors:  Anamika Kashyap; Manjula Jain; Shailaja Shukla; Manoj Andley
Journal:  J Cytol       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Estimation of tumor heterogeneity using CGH array data.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Jian Li; Shengting Li; Lars Bolund; Carsten Wiuf
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Comparison of 3-tier cytological grading systems for breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Dinisha Einstien; B O Parijatham Omprakash; Hemalatha Ganapathy; Sadaf Rahman
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2014-03-12

10.  Comparative evaluation of six parametric Robinson and three parametric Howell's modification of Scarf-BloomRichardson grading method on breast aspirates with histopathology: A prospective study.

Authors:  Vaishali A Walke; Gajanan Gunjkar
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.091

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.