Literature DB >> 14506406

Longitudinal model predicting partner violence among white, black, and Hispanic couples in the United States.

Craig A Field1, Raul Caetano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A limited amount of information pertaining to ethnic-specific risk factors associated with intimate partner violence across time currently exists. The current study examines ethnic-specific longitudinal predictors of male-to-female and female-to-male partner violence (MFPV and FMPV) in white, black, and Hispanic couples in the U.S. general population.
METHODS: In 1995, a total of 1635 married or cohabitating couples 18 years of age or older living in households in the 48 contiguous states participated in a national survey that used a multistage probability sampling procedure with 100 primary sampling units and included oversamples of blacks and Hispanics. In 2000, the follow-up survey had an overall response rate of 72% and included 406 white, 232 black, and 387 Hispanic intact couples.Ethnic-specific regression models predicting MFPV and FMPV at follow-up were developed. The risk factors of interest included male and female reports of history of childhood abuse, exposure to parental violence, impulsivity, alcohol problems, frequency of drinking five or more drinks per occasion, volume of alcohol consumed per week in average standard drinks, approval of marital aggression and male-to-female and female-to-male partner violence at baseline. MFPV and FMPV in 1995 and 2000 were based on the Conflict Tactics Scale Form R.
RESULTS: Black and Hispanic couples were at approximately three times greater risk of MFPV and two times greater risk of FMPV at follow-up in comparison to white couples even after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, alcohol consumption, and psychosocial variables. Extreme specific models indicated that among blacks, MFPV was a significant predictor of MFPV and FMPV at follow-up. In contrast, among Hispanics, FMPV was a significant predictor of FMPV and MFPV at follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic-specific multivariate logistic regression models indicated that the predictors of MFPV and FMPV including psychosocial variables, alcohol use, and alcohol-related problems varied by ethnicity. These findings contribute to our continually growing knowledge base regarding ethnic differences associated with the development of intimate partner violence and have important implications for prevention and intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14506406     DOI: 10.1097/01.ALC.0000086066.70540.8C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 0145-6008            Impact factor:   3.455


  22 in total

1.  Risk factors for intimate partner violence initiation and persistence among high psychosocial risk Asian and Pacific Islander women in intact relationships.

Authors:  Sarah Shea Crowne; Hee-Soon Juon; Margaret Ensminger; Megan H Bair-Merritt; Anne Duggan
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011-10-17

2.  Drinking and spouse abuse among U.S. Army soldiers.

Authors:  Nicole S Bell; Thomas Harford; James E McCarroll; Laura Senier
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Spouse abuse and alcohol problems among white, African American, and Hispanic U.S. Army soldiers.

Authors:  Nicole S Bell; Thomas C Harford; Cara H Fuchs; James E McCarroll; Carolyn E Schwartz
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Evaluation of the One Love Escalation Workshop for Dating Abuse Prevention: a Randomized Controlled Trial Pilot Study with a Sample of US Navy Sailors.

Authors:  Emily F Rothman; Julia K Campbell; Emily Quinn; Sonia Smith; Ziming Xuan
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 5.  Risk Factors for Hispanic Male Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration.

Authors:  Bibiana M Mancera; Sandor Dorgo; Elias Provencio-Vasquez
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2015-04-19

6.  Preliminary development of a neuroimaging paradigm to examine neural correlates of relationship conflict.

Authors:  Julianne C Flanagan; Shayla Yonce; Casey D Calhoun; Sudie E Back; Kathleen T Brady; Jane E Joseph
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 2.376

7.  Intimate Partner Violence among California Couples: Multilevel Analysis of Environmental and Partner Risk Factors.

Authors:  Carol B Cunradi; Michael Todd; Christina Mair; Lillian Remer
Journal:  Partner Abuse       Date:  2013-10-01

8.  Drinking and Intimate Partner Violence Severity Levels Among U.S. Ethnic Groups in an Urban Emergency Department.

Authors:  Raul Caetano; Carol B Cunradi; Harrison J Alter; Christina Mair; Rebecca K Yau
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Does the inclusion criterion of women's aggression as opposed to their victimization result in samples that differ on key dimensions of intimate partner violence?

Authors:  Tami P Sullivan; Jennifer A Titus; Laura J Holt; Suzanne C Swan; Bonnie S Fisher; David L Snow
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2010-01

10.  The occurrence of female-to-male partner violence among male intimate partner violence offenders mandated to treatment: a brief research report.

Authors:  Cory A Crane; Samuel W Hawes; Dolores L Mandel; Caroline J Easton
Journal:  Violence Vict       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.