Literature DB >> 14506094

Active recovery attenuates the fall in sweat rate but not cutaneous vascular conductance after supine exercise.

Thad E Wilson1, Robert Carter, Michael J Cutler, Jian Cui, Michael L Smith, Craig G Crandall.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify whether baroreceptor unloading was responsible for less efficient heat loss responses (i.e., skin blood flow and sweat rate) previously reported during inactive compared with active recovery after upright cycle exercise (Carter R III, Wilson TE, Watenpaugh DE, Smith ML, and Crandall CG. J Appl Physiol 93: 1918-1929, 2002). Eight healthy adults performed two 15-min bouts of supine cycle exercise followed by inactive or active (no-load pedaling) supine recovery. Core temperature (T(core)), mean skin temperature (T(sk)), heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), thoracic impedance, central venous pressure (n = 4), cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC; laser-Doppler flux/MAP expressed as percentage of maximal vasodilation), and sweat rate were measured throughout exercise and during 5 min of recovery. Exercise bouts were similar in power output, heart rate, T(core), and T(sk). Baroreceptor loading and thermal status were similar during trials because MAP (90 +/- 4, 88 +/- 4 mmHg), thoracic impedance (29 +/- 1, 28 +/- 2 Omega), central venous pressure (5 +/- 1, 4 +/- 1 mmHg), T(core) (37.5 +/- 0.1, 37.5 +/- 0.1 degrees C), and T(sk) (34.1 +/- 0.3, 34.2 +/- 0.2 degrees C) were not significantly different at 3 min of recovery between active and inactive recoveries, respectively; all P > 0.05. At 3 min of recovery, chest CVC was not significantly different between active (25 +/- 6% of maximum) and inactive (28 +/- 6% of maximum; P > 0.05) recovery. In contrast, at this time point, chest sweat rate was higher during active (0.45 +/- 0.16 mg.cm(-2).min(-1)) compared with inactive (0.34 +/- 0.19 mg.cm(-2).min(-1); P < 0.05) recovery. After exercise CVC and sweat rate are differentially controlled, with CVC being primarily influenced by baroreceptor loading status while sweat rate is influenced by other factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14506094     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00522.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  5 in total

1.  Methodological assessment of skin and limb blood flows in the human forearm during thermal and baroreceptor provocations.

Authors:  R Matthew Brothers; Jonathan E Wingo; Kimberly A Hubing; Craig G Crandall
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-07-15

2.  Evidence of a greater onset threshold for sweating in females following intense exercise.

Authors:  Glen P Kenny; Ollie Jay
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The influence of fatigue-induced increase in relative work rate on temperature regulation during exercise.

Authors:  Alan Kacin; Petra Golja; Michael J Tipton; Ola Eiken; Igor B Mekjavic
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Age-related differences in postsynaptic increases in sweating and skin blood flow postexercise.

Authors:  Jill M Stapleton; Naoto Fujii; Ryan McGinn; Katherine McDonald; Glen P Kenny
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2014-07-16

Review 5.  Do We Need a Cool-Down After Exercise? A Narrative Review of the Psychophysiological Effects and the Effects on Performance, Injuries and the Long-Term Adaptive Response.

Authors:  Bas Van Hooren; Jonathan M Peake
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 11.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.