Literature DB >> 14504922

SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS regulates the transition and maintenance of flowering in tomato.

Nuria Molinero-Rosales1, Antonio Latorre, Manuel Jamilena, Rafael Lozano.   

Abstract

The characterisation of the single flower truss ( sft) mutant phenotype of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), as well as its genetic interactions with other mutations affecting FALSIFLORA ( FA) and SELF PRUNING ( SP) genes, has revealed that SFT is a key gene in the control of floral transition and floral meristem identity. The single sft mutation produces a late-flowering phenotype in both long-day and short-day conditions. In combination with fa, a mutation affecting the tomato gene orthologous to LFY, sft completely blocks the transition to flowering in this species. Thus, the phenotype of the sft fa double mutants indicates that SFT and FA participate in two parallel pathways that regulate the switch from vegetative to reproductive phase in tomato, and that both genes are indispensable for flowering. On the other hand, the replacement of flowers by vegetative shoots observed in the sft inflorescence suggests that SFT regulates flower meristem identity during inflorescence development of tomato. In addition to these two main functions, SFT is involved in the development of both flowers and sympodial shoots of tomato. First, the mutation produces a partial conversion of sepals into leaves in the first floral whorl, and a reduction in the number of floral organs, particularly carpels. Secondly, the sympodial development in the mutant plants is altered, which can be related to the interaction between SFT and SP, a gene controlling the number of nodes in sympodial shoots. In fact, we have found that the sft phenotype is epistatic to that of sp, and that the level of SP mRNA in the apical buds of sft around flowering is reduced. SFT can therefore co-ordinate the regulation of two simultaneous developmental processes in the tomato apical shoot, the promotion of flowering in one sympodial segment and the vegetative development of the next segment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14504922     DOI: 10.1007/s00425-003-1109-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  21 in total

1.  Integration of floral inductive signals in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  M A Blázquez; D Weigel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  GENETIC CONTROL OF FLOWERING TIME IN ARABIDOPSIS.

Authors:  Maarten Koornneef; Carlos Alonso-Blanco; Anton J. M. Peeters; Wim Soppe
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1998-06

3.  The isolation and characterization of gibberellin-deficient mutants in tomato.

Authors:  M Koornneef; T D Bosma; C J Hanhart; J H van der Veen; J A Zeevaart
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.699

4.  The transition to flowering

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.277

5.  Control of flower development and phyllotaxy by meristem identity genes in antirrhinum.

Authors:  R Carpenter; L Copsey; C Vincent; S Doyle; R Magrath; E Coen
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Stamenless, a tomato mutant with homeotic conversions in petals and stamens.

Authors: 
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1999-08-12       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  Analysis of flowering time control in Arabidopsis by comparison of double and triple mutants.

Authors:  P H Reeves; G Coupland
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Ethylene-regulated gene expression in tomato fruit: characterization of novel ethylene-responsive and ripening-related genes isolated by differential display

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.417

9.  Bracteomania, an inflorescence anomaly, is caused by the loss of function of the MADS-box gene squamosa in Antirrhinum majus.

Authors:  P Huijser; J Klein; W E Lönnig; H Meijer; H Saedler; H Sommer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Redundant regulation of meristem identity and plant architecture by FRUITFULL, APETALA1 and CAULIFLOWER.

Authors:  C Ferrándiz; Q Gu; R Martienssen; M F Yanofsky
Journal:  Development       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  39 in total

1.  The tomato FT ortholog triggers systemic signals that regulate growth and flowering and substitute for diverse environmental stimuli.

Authors:  Eliezer Lifschitz; Tamar Eviatar; Alexander Rozman; Akiva Shalit; Alexander Goldshmidt; Ziva Amsellem; John Paul Alvarez; Yuval Eshed
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Phytoplasmal infection derails genetically preprogrammed meristem fate and alters plant architecture.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Robert Edward Davis; Donald L Nuss; Yan Zhao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Revisiting the involvement of SELF-PRUNING in the sympodial growth of tomato.

Authors:  Johanna Thouet; Muriel Quinet; Sandra Ormenese; Jean-Marie Kinet; Claire Périlleux
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  JOINTLESS suppresses sympodial identity in inflorescence meristems of tomato.

Authors:  Eugene J Szymkowiak; Erin E Irish
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2005-10-01       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  SELF-PRUNING Acts Synergistically with DIAGEOTROPICA to Guide Auxin Responses and Proper Growth Form.

Authors:  Willian B Silva; Mateus H Vicente; Jessenia M Robledo; Diego S Reartes; Renata C Ferrari; Ricardo Bianchetti; Wagner L Araújo; Luciano Freschi; Lázaro E P Peres; Agustin Zsögön
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Downregulation of PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR 4 Influences Plant Development and Fruit Production.

Authors:  Daniele Rosado; Bruna Trench; Ricardo Bianchetti; Rafael Zuccarelli; Frederico Rocha Rodrigues Alves; Eduardo Purgatto; Eny Iochevet Segal Floh; Fabio Tebaldi Silveira Nogueira; Luciano Freschi; Magdalena Rossi
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Pivotal Roles of Cryptochromes 1a and 2 in Tomato Development and Physiology.

Authors:  Elio Fantini; Maria Sulli; Lei Zhang; Giuseppe Aprea; José M Jiménez-Gómez; Abdelhafid Bendahmane; Gaetano Perrotta; Giovanni Giuliano; Paolo Facella
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Coordination of Meristem Doming and the Floral Transition by Late Termination, a Kelch Repeat Protein.

Authors:  Lior Tal; Gilgi Friedlander; Netta Segal Gilboa; Tamar Unger; Shlomit Gilad; Yuval Eshed
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  A role for APETALA1/fruitfull transcription factors in tomato leaf development.

Authors:  Yogev Burko; Sharona Shleizer-Burko; Osnat Yanai; Ido Shwartz; Iris Daphne Zelnik; Jasmine Jacob-Hirsch; Itai Kela; Leor Eshed-Williams; Naomi Ori
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  Genetic interactions of the unfinished flower development (ufd) mutant support a significant role of the tomato UFD gene in regulating floral organogenesis.

Authors:  Sandra Poyatos-Pertíñez; Muriel Quinet; Ana Ortíz-Atienza; Sandra Bretones; Fernando J Yuste-Lisbona; Rafael Lozano
Journal:  Plant Reprod       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 3.767

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.