Literature DB >> 14504809

[Development of a questionnaire to assess the quality of the preanesthetic visit].

S A Snyder-Ramos1, H Seintsch, B W Böttiger, J Motsch, E Martin, M Bauer.   

Abstract

In the current study a questionnaire was developed to evaluate the preanesthetic visit to prepare patients for general anesthesia with regard to the effects on in-hospital quality of care. The questionnaire consists of one part pertaining to patient satisfaction and one part pertaining to the information gained from the preanesthetic visit. In a first phase, the questionnaire was generated and then validated in 104 patients undergoing general or vascular surgery at the University of Heidelberg, Germany. As a result of the pretest evaluation, the preliminary pool of questions could be reduced. Consequently, the final questionnaire is composed of six questions on patient satisfaction and six questions on information gained after the preanesthetic visit as well as one question regarding the number of preanesthetic consultations prior to general anesthesia. In the part of the questionnaire on patient satisfaction, responses can be given on a 6-point scale ranging from -3 (statement is not correct) to +3 (statement is correct). The scores -3 to +3 are assigned 1-6 points, in order to calculate a total sum score to measure patient satisfaction. The part on information gained contains multiple-choice questions with four possible answers, of which only one is correct. Analogous to the measurement of patient satisfaction, a total sum score can be calculated to evaluate the information gain after the preanesthetic visit. The present study shows the suitability of a questionnaire to evaluate the quality of health care after the preanesthetic visit with the parameters patient satisfaction and information gain. Such a questionnaire can be used to compare different premedication techniques and, thus, might contribute to improve the quality of health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14504809     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-003-0551-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  15 in total

1.  [Legal framework for hospital financing. Development and consequences].

Authors:  M Bauer; A Bach
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  A customized view of public satisfaction.

Authors:  K Humphreys; S McIver
Journal:  Health Serv J       Date:  1987-05-28

Review 3.  Patient satisfaction: what we know about and what we still need to explore.

Authors:  L Aharony; S Strasser
Journal:  Med Care Rev       Date:  1993

Review 4.  Measuring patient satisfaction with anesthesia care: a review of current methodology.

Authors:  D Fung; M M Cohen
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  [Patient knowledge concerning anesthesia general practice and the responsibilities of the anesthetist].

Authors:  E Deusch; T Weber; G Libal; L Christian; C Ofner
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 0.698

6.  [Perioperative monitoring of the course of anesthesia, the postanesthesia visit and inquiry of patient satisfaction. A prospective study of parameters in process and outcome quality in anesthesia].

Authors:  U Bothner; B Schwilk; P Steffen; L H Eberhart; U Becker; M Georgieff
Journal:  Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 0.698

7.  Patients' knowledge of anaesthetic practice and the rôle of anaesthetists.

Authors:  C F Swinhoe; E R Groves
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  The importance of the postoperative anesthetic visit: do repeated visits improve patient satisfaction or physician recognition?

Authors:  D A Zvara; J M Nelson; R F Brooker; D D Mathes; P H Petrozza; M T Anderson; D M Whelan; M A Olympio; R L Royster
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Patient knowledge of anaesthesia and peri-operative care.

Authors:  M A Hume; B Kennedy; A J Asbury
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  From the other end of the needle. The patient's experience of routine anaesthesia.

Authors:  P J Keep; J R Jenkins
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 6.955

View more
  7 in total

1.  [Current level of patients' knowledge of anaesthesiology].

Authors:  M Bauer; J Scholz; S Marz; C Spies; H Wulf; J Boldt; F K Pühringer; H Laubenthal; E F Kochs
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Increasing efficiency and patient satisfaction by structured clinical processes in presurgical visits].

Authors:  J Schuld; M R Moussavian; B Frank; U A Schmidt; O Kollmar; M K Schilling; S Richter
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  [Patients' needs and expectations regarding anaesthesia. A survey on the pre-anaesthetic visit of patients and anaesthesiologists].

Authors:  C K Hofer; M T Ganter; L Furrer; G Guthauser; R Klaghofer; A Zollinger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 4.  [Video-assisted patient education in anaesthesiology: possibilities and limits of a new procedure for improvement of patient information].

Authors:  C Salzwedel; S Marz; M Bauer; M Schuster
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Evolving with modern technology: Impact of incorporating audiovisual aids in preanesthetic checkup clinics on patient education and anxiety.

Authors:  Haramritpal Kaur; Gurpreet Singh; Amandeep Singh; Gagandeep Sharda; Shobha Aggarwal
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2016 Sep-Dec

6.  Effectiveness of pre-anesthetic video information on patient anxiety and economical aspects.

Authors:  Thomas Metterlein; Thomas Wobbe; Marc-Elmer Brede; Katharina Möller; Daniel Röder; Jens Krannich; Peter Kranke; Andreas Tannert; Jens Broscheit
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2021-04-01

7.  Identifying communication-related predictors of patient satisfaction in a briefing prior to contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

Authors:  Valentina Scholz; Sandra Lange; Britta Rosenberg; Marie-Luise Kromrey; Annika Syperek; Norbert Hosten; Thomas Kohlmann; Michael Kirsch
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2019-09-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.