Literature DB >> 14503399

Laboratory workup for osteoporosis. Which tests are most cost-effective?

Carolyn Crandall1.   

Abstract

Secondary causes of osteoporosis often go undetected, in part because of the lack of specific guidelines for laboratory evaluation in newly diagnosed cases. Although the effect of menopause on bone density has been well studied, the exact prevalence of other contributing factors is unknown. In this article, Dr Crandall discusses the controversies surrounding laboratory workup after diagnosis of osteoporosis and reviews two studies that suggest a cost-effective approach to screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14503399     DOI: 10.3810/pgm.2003.09.1492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med        ISSN: 0032-5481            Impact factor:   3.840


  4 in total

1.  The utility of BMD Z-score diagnostic thresholds for secondary causes of osteoporosis.

Authors:  F E McKiernan; R L Berg; J G Linneman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Bone regeneration in dentistry.

Authors:  Paolo Tonelli; Marco Duvina; Luigi Barbato; Eleonora Biondi; Niccolò Nuti; Leila Brancato; Giovanna Delle Rose
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2011-09

3.  Utility of biochemical screening in the context of evaluating patients with a presumptive diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  C Rajeswaran; J Spencer; J H Barth; S M Orme
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Bone Health Improvement Protocol.

Authors:  Nathan K Wool; Shannon Wilson; Alexander Cm Chong; Bradley R Dart
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2017-08-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.