Literature DB >> 14503395

Attractiveness, distinctiveness, and recognition of faces: attractive faces can be typical or distinctive but are not better recognized.

Lee H Wickham1, Peter E Morris.   

Abstract

The debate surrounding the relationship between facial attractiveness and distinctiveness appears to arise from different definitions of distinctiveness. In our study unfamiliar faces were rated for attractiveness, age, and distinctiveness. Two measures of distinctiveness were used: ease of spotting the face in a crowd (traditional) and deviation from an average face (deviation). Recognition was not predicted by attractiveness. The traditional ratings produced a complex relationship with attractiveness, where unattractive faces were distinctive, but attractive faces were rated at all levels of distinctiveness. When the effects of age were partialled out, attractiveness no longer predicted traditional distinctiveness. However, deviation ratings produced a strong negative correlation with attractiveness, even when the effects of age were removed.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14503395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychol        ISSN: 0002-9556


  11 in total

1.  Distinctiveness, typicality, and recollective experience in face recognition: a principal components analysis.

Authors:  Stephen A Dewhurst; Dennis C Hay; Lee H V Wickham
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-12

2.  Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: a neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness.

Authors:  Logan T Trujillo; Jessica M Jankowitsch; Judith H Langlois
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The power of liking: Highly sensitive aesthetic processing for guiding us through the world.

Authors:  Stella J Faerber; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2012-09-26

4.  Beauty hinders attention switch in change detection: the role of facial attractiveness and distinctiveness.

Authors:  Wenfeng Chen; Chang Hong Liu; Kazuyo Nakabayashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Role of Familiarity for Representations in Norm-Based Face Space.

Authors:  Stella J Faerber; Jürgen M Kaufmann; Helmut Leder; Eva Maria Martin; Stefan R Schweinberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Always on My Mind? Recognition of Attractive Faces May Not Depend on Attention.

Authors:  André Silva; António F Macedo; Pedro B Albuquerque; Joana Arantes
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-29

7.  Facial Cosmetics and Attractiveness: Comparing the Effect Sizes of Professionally-Applied Cosmetics and Identity.

Authors:  Alex L Jones; Robin S S Kramer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Taking the Perfect Selfie: Investigating the Impact of Perspective on the Perception of Higher Cognitive Variables.

Authors:  Tobias M Schneider; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-09

9.  Faces with Light Makeup Are Better Recognized than Faces with Heavy Makeup.

Authors:  Keiko Tagai; Hitomi Ohtaka; Hiroshi Nittono
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-01

10.  An Adult Developmental Approach to Perceived Facial Attractiveness and Distinctiveness.

Authors:  Natalie C Ebner; Joerg Luedicke; Manuel C Voelkle; Michaela Riediger; Tian Lin; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.