Masakuni Noguchi1. 1. Surgical Center, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan. nogumasa@med.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: So-called minimally invasive techniques make percutaneous eradication of breast tumors possible, thus leading to breast-conserving treatment (BCT) without surgery. This paper reviews and discusses the feasibility of minimally invasive techniques for breast cancer. RESULTS: Although a wide variety of ablation techniques have been investigated for the treatment of primary breast cancer, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) remains one of the most promising and potentially useful tools. RFA therapy results in effective cell killing in a predictable volume of tissue with a low complication rate. On the other hand, ultrasonography is useful for guiding the needle within the tumor but cannot predict the extent of thermal ablation accurately. Early post-procedural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be useful for assessing whether complete tumor ablation has been achieved by RFA. Whether adequate ablation of the tumor has been achieved can be confirmed by extensive core needle sampling of the treated area. However, validation of the margin status is also important and this needs to be tackled in further studies. CONCLUSIONS: There are many problems that remain before RFA therapy can be considered for conventional treatment. Further studies are needed to determine whether the use of RFA alone for local treatment of primary breast cancer will result in local recurrence and survival rates equivalent to those seen with BCT. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: So-called minimally invasive techniques make percutaneous eradication of breast tumors possible, thus leading to breast-conserving treatment (BCT) without surgery. This paper reviews and discusses the feasibility of minimally invasive techniques for breast cancer. RESULTS: Although a wide variety of ablation techniques have been investigated for the treatment of primary breast cancer, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) remains one of the most promising and potentially useful tools. RFA therapy results in effective cell killing in a predictable volume of tissue with a low complication rate. On the other hand, ultrasonography is useful for guiding the needle within the tumor but cannot predict the extent of thermal ablation accurately. Early post-procedural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be useful for assessing whether complete tumor ablation has been achieved by RFA. Whether adequate ablation of the tumor has been achieved can be confirmed by extensive core needle sampling of the treated area. However, validation of the margin status is also important and this needs to be tackled in further studies. CONCLUSIONS: There are many problems that remain before RFA therapy can be considered for conventional treatment. Further studies are needed to determine whether the use of RFA alone for local treatment of primary breast cancer will result in local recurrence and survival rates equivalent to those seen with BCT. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Roberto Ballarin; Mario Spaggiari; Nicola Cautero; Nicola De Ruvo; Roberto Montalti; Cristina Longo; Anna Pecchi; Patrizia Giacobazzi; Giuseppina De Marco; Giuseppe D'Amico; Giorgio Enrico Gerunda; Fabrizio Di Benedetto Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2011-11-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Vilhelm Ekstrand; Hans Wiksell; Inkeri Schultz; Bengt Sandstedt; Samuel Rotstein; Anders Eriksson Journal: Biomed Eng Online Date: 2005-07-11 Impact factor: 2.819