Literature DB >> 14501500

Improvement in treatment results and long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer: impact of chemoradiation and change in treatment strategy.

Simon Law1, Dora L W Kwong, Ka-Fai Kwok, Kam-Ho Wong, Kent-Man Chu, Jonathan S T Sham, John Wong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify prognostic factors and reasons for improved survival over time in patients with esophageal cancer. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Management strategies for esophageal cancer have evolved with time. The impact of chemoradiation in the overall treatment results has not been adequately studied.
METHODS: From 1990 to 2000, 399 (62.4%) of 639 patients with intrathoracic squamous cancers underwent resection. Two study periods were analyzed: period I (01/1990-06/1995), and period II (07/1995-12/2000); during period II, chemoradiation was introduced. Prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis and the 2 periods compared.
RESULTS: Hospital mortality rate after resection decreased from 7.8% to 1.2%, P = 0.002. Five favorable prognostic factors were identified: female gender (female vs. male, HR = 0.66), infracarinal tumor location (infra vs. supra-carinal, HR = 0.63), low pTNM stage (III/IV vs. 0/I/II/T0N1, HR = 1.76), pM0 stage (M1a/b vs. M0, HR = 1.56), and R0 category (R1/2 vs. R0, HR = 2.49). Median survival was 15.8 and 25.6 months in periods I and II, respectively, P = 0.02. More R0 resections were evident in period II, being possible in 63% (period I) and 79% (period II) of patients, P = 0.001. This was attributed to tumor downstaging by chemoradiation and more stringent patient selection for resection in period II. Performing less R1/2 resections in period II coincided with using primary chemoradiation in treating advanced tumors. In patients treated without resection, survival also improved from 3 (period I) to 5.8 months (period II), P < 0.01.
CONCLUSIONS: Survival has improved; chemoradiation enabled better patient selection for curative resections and also resulted in more R0 resections by tumor downstaging. This treatment strategy led to overall better outcome for the whole patient cohort, even in those treated by nonsurgical means.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14501500      PMCID: PMC1422701          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000086545.45918.ee

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  36 in total

Review 1.  Two-field dissection is enough for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  S Law; J Wong
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.429

2.  Preoperative chemotherapy versus surgical therapy alone for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  S Law; M Fok; S Chow; K M Chu; J Wong
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  A prospective randomized comparison of transhiatal and transthoracic resection for lower-third esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  K M Chu; S Y Law; M Fok; J Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Law; M Fok; K M Chu; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Intraoperative radiation therapy to the upper mediastinum and nerve-sparing three-field lymphadenectomy followed by external beam radiotherapy for patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  M Hosokawa; H Shirato; M Ohara; K Kagei; S Hashimoto; S Nishino; A Takamura; T Arimoto
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J B Hulscher; J G Tijssen; H Obertop; J J van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection.

Authors:  B P Whooley; S Law; S C Murthy; A Alexandrou; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Histologic tumor type is an independent prognostic parameter in esophageal cancer: lessons from more than 1,000 consecutive resections at a single center in the Western world.

Authors:  J R Siewert; H J Stein; M Feith; B L Bruecher; H Bartels; U Fink
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85-01). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

Authors:  J S Cooper; M D Guo; A Herskovic; J S Macdonald; J A Martenson; M Al-Sarraf; R Byhardt; A H Russell; J J Beitler; S Spencer; S O Asbell; M V Graham; L L Leichman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-05-05       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  H Bartels; H J Stein; J R Siewert
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  49 in total

1.  Metastasis-associated protein 1 nuclear expression is closely associated with tumor progression and angiogenesis in patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer.

Authors:  Shu-Hai Li; Hui Tian; Wei-Ming Yue; Lin Li; Cun Gao; Wen-Jun Li; Wen-Si Hu; Bin Hao
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Effects of neutrophil elastase inhibitor in patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhi-Qiang Wang; Long-Qi Chen; Yong Yuan; Wen-Ping Wang; Zhong-Xi Niu; Yu-Shang Yang; Jie Cai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on pTNM staging and its prognostic significance in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Simon Law; Dora L W Kwong; Kam-Ho Wong; Ka-Fai Kwok; John Wong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Clinical relevance of Fas expression in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  K W Chan; P Y Lee; A K Y Lam; S Law; J Wong; G Srivastava
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  [R1 resection in the surgery of upper gastrointestinal tumors: relevance and therapeutic consequences].

Authors:  F Lordick; K Ott; A Novotny; C Schuhmacher; J R Siewert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  [Neoadjuvant therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus].

Authors:  F Lordick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  Current management of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Simon Law; John Wong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Surgical treatment of superficial esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuo Tachibana; Shoichi Kinugasa; Muneaki Shibakita; Yasuhito Tonomoto; Shinji Hattori; Ryoji Hyakudomi; Hiroshi Yoshimura; Dipok Kumar Dhar; Naofumi Nagasue
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-07-08       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Esophagectomy without mortality: what can surgeons do?

Authors:  Simon Law
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Survival after oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus.

Authors:  Hubert J Stein; Burkhard H A von Rahden; J Rüdiger Siewert
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.