Literature DB >> 14501394

The methamphetamine burn patient.

P Warner1, J P Connolly, N S Gibran, D M Heimbach, L H Engrav.   

Abstract

Early aggressive fluid resuscitation has significantly decreased the morbidity and mortality associated with volume losses from large burns. Although most patients are adequately resuscitated using the Parkland formula, we noted increased fluid requirements for shock resuscitation in patients involved in methamphetamine laboratory explosions. Because predominant users are young healthy individuals in their 20s and 30s, we had not anticipated burn shock resuscitation failures in this patient group. We reviewed our experience with burn patients with documented methamphetamine use to determine whether this patient group presents new dilemmas to the burn surgeon. A 2-year retrospective study of 30 patients (15 methamphetamine users, 15 controls) revealed that the methamphetamine burn patient requires two to three times the standard Parkland formula resuscitation. In this study, methamphetamine burns larger than 40% TBSA had a 100% mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14501394     DOI: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000085855.14964.01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil        ISSN: 0273-8481


  4 in total

1.  Clinical and Socioeconomic Differences in Methamphetamine-Positive Burn Patients.

Authors:  Eve A Solomon; David G Greenhalgh; Soman Sen; Tina L Palmieri; Kathleen S Romanowski
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.845

2.  Bias in alcohol and drug screening in adult burn patients.

Authors:  Felicia N Williams; Lori Chrisco; Paula D Strassle; Sarah L Laughon; Sanja Sljivic; Kamil Nurczyk; Rabia Nizamani; Booker T King; Anthony Charles
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2020-08-15

3.  Intraabdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome in burn patients.

Authors:  Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Chad G Ball; Duncan Nickerson; Scott K D'Amours
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Stimulants and the lung : review of literature.

Authors:  Will Tseng; Mark E Sutter; Timothy E Albertson
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 8.667

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.