Literature DB >> 14500521

Different strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cause various spectrums of disease in the rabbit model of tuberculosis.

Yukari C Manabe1, Arthur M Dannenberg, Sandeep K Tyagi, Christine L Hatem, Mark Yoder, Samuel C Woolwine, Bernard C Zook, M Louise M Pitt, William R Bishai.   

Abstract

The rabbit model of tuberculosis has been used historically to differentiate between Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis based on their relative virulence in this animal host. M. tuberculosis infection in market rabbits is cleared over time, whereas infection with M. bovis results in chronic, progressive, cavitary disease leading to death. Because of the innate resistance of commercial rabbits to M. tuberculosis, 320 to 1,890 log-phase, actively growing inhaled bacilli were required to form one grossly visible pulmonary tubercle at 5 weeks. The range of inhaled doses required to make one tubercle allows us to determine the relative pathogenicities of different strains. Fewer inhaled organisms of the M. tuberculosis Erdman strain were required than of M. tuberculosis H37Rv to produce a visible lesion at 5 weeks. Furthermore, with the Erdman strain, only 7 of 15 rabbits had healed lesions at 16 to 18 weeks; among the other animals, two had chronic, progressive cavitary disease, a phenotype usually seen only with M. bovis infection. Genotypic investigation of the Erdman strain with an H37Rv-based microarray identified gene differences in the RD6 region. Southern blot and PCR structural genetic analysis showed significant differences between M. tuberculosis strains in this region. Correlation of the relative pathogenicity, including disease severity, in the rabbit model with the strain genotype may help identify stage-specific M. tuberculosis genes important in human disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14500521      PMCID: PMC201108          DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.10.6004-6011.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Immun        ISSN: 0019-9567            Impact factor:   3.441


  39 in total

1.  New insertion sequences and a novel repeated sequence in the genome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv.

Authors:  Stephen V Gordon; Beate Heym; Julian Parkhill; Bart Barrell; Stewart T Cole
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.777

2.  Virulence of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolate in mice is determined by failure to induce Th1 type immunity and is associated with induction of IFN-alpha /beta.

Authors:  C Manca; L Tsenova; A Bergtold; S Freeman; M Tovey; J M Musser; C E Barry; V H Freedman; G Kaplan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis CDC1551 and H37Rv in rabbits evaluated by Lurie's pulmonary tubercle count method.

Authors:  W R Bishai; A M Dannenberg; N Parrish; R Ruiz; P Chen; B C Zook; W Johnson; J W Boles; M L Pitt
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.441

4.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis CDC1551 induces a more vigorous host response in vivo and in vitro, but is not more virulent than other clinical isolates.

Authors:  C Manca; L Tsenova; C E Barry; A Bergtold; S Freeman; P A Haslett; J M Musser; V H Freedman; G Kaplan
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Growth rate of mycobacteria in mice as an unreliable indicator of mycobacterial virulence.

Authors:  R J North; L Ryan; R LaCource; T Mogues; M E Goodrich
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.441

6.  Efficacies of BCG and vole bacillus (Mycobacterium microti) vaccines in preventing clinically apparent pulmonary tuberculosis in rabbits: a preliminary report.

Authors:  A M Dannenberg; W R Bishai; N Parrish; R Ruiz; W Johnson; B C Zook; J W Boles; L M Pitt
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2000-11-22       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Identification of variable regions in the genomes of tubercle bacilli using bacterial artificial chromosome arrays.

Authors:  S V Gordon; R Brosch; A Billault; T Garnier; K Eiglmeier; S T Cole
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  T cell expression cloning of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis gene encoding a protective antigen associated with the early control of infection.

Authors:  Y A Skeiky; P J Ovendale; S Jen; M R Alderson; D C Dillon; S Smith; C B Wilson; I M Orme; S G Reed; A Campos-Neto
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 5.422

9.  Comparing genomes within the species Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  M Kato-Maeda; J T Rhee; T R Gingeras; H Salamon; J Drenkow; N Smittipat; P M Small
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Comparison of Mycobacterium tuberculosis genomes reveals frequent deletions in a 20 kb variable region in clinical isolates.

Authors:  T B Ho; B D Robertson; G M Taylor; R J Shaw; D B Young
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.239

View more
  56 in total

1.  Importance of confirming data on the in vivo efficacy of novel antibacterial drug regimens against various strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Mary A De Groote; Veronica Gruppo; Lisa K Woolhiser; Ian M Orme; Janet C Gilliland; Anne J Lenaerts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pulmonary lesions in guinea pigs infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Susan L Kraft; Deanna Dailey; Matthew Kovach; Karen L Stasiak; Jamie Bennett; Christine T McFarland; David N McMurray; Angelo A Izzo; Ian M Orme; Randall J Basaraba
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  Does M. tuberculosis genomic diversity explain disease diversity?

Authors:  Mireilla Coscolla; Sebastien Gagneux
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Dis Mech       Date:  2010

4.  Effects of dexamethasone and transient malnutrition on rabbits infected with aerosolized Mycobacterium tuberculosis CDC1551.

Authors:  Anup K Kesavan; Susana E Mendez; Christine L Hatem; Javier Lopez-Molina; Katherine Aird; M Louise M Pitt; Arthur M Dannenberg; Yukari C Manabe
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.441

5.  Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype strains by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Doris Hillemann; Rob Warren; Tanja Kubica; Sabine Rüsch-Gerdes; Stefan Niemann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  The transmission and control of XDR TB in South Africa: an operations research and mathematical modelling approach.

Authors:  S Basu; A P Galvani
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 2.451

7.  Effect of sex, age, and race on the clinical presentation of tuberculosis: a 15-year population-based study.

Authors:  Xinyu Zhang; Aase B Andersen; Troels Lillebaek; Zaza Kamper-Jørgensen; Vibeke Østergaard Thomsen; Karin Ladefoged; Carl F Marrs; Lixin Zhang; Zhenhua Yang
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  Artemisia annua and Artemisia afra extracts exhibit strong bactericidal activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Maria Carla Martini; Tianbi Zhang; John T Williams; Robert B Abramovitch; Pamela J Weathers; Scarlet S Shell
Journal:  J Ethnopharmacol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 4.360

9.  Correlation of virulence, lung pathology, bacterial load and delayed type hypersensitivity responses after infection with different Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypes in a BALB/c mouse model.

Authors:  J Dormans; M Burger; D Aguilar; R Hernandez-Pando; K Kremer; P Roholl; S M Arend; D van Soolingen
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Susceptibility to tuberculosis: composition of tuberculous granulomas in Thorbecke and outbred New Zealand White rabbits.

Authors:  Susana Mendez; Christine L Hatem; Anup K Kesavan; Javier Lopez-Molina; M Louise M Pitt; Arthur M Dannenberg; Yukari C Manabe
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 2.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.