Literature DB >> 14500057

Surgical Treatments Outcomes Project for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (STOP-DUB): design and methods.

Kay Dickersin1, Malcolm Munro, Patricia Langenberg, Roberta Scherer, Kevin D Frick, Anne M Weber, Alan Johns, Jeffrey F Peipert, Melissa Clark.   

Abstract

The Surgical Treatments Outcomes Project for Dysfunctional Uterine Bleeding (STOP-DUB) was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial that assessed the efficacy and effectiveness of hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation (EA) for dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) in women for whom medical management has not provided relief. Resource centers included a coordinating center, a chair's office, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Project Office and 33 clinical centers in the United States and Canada. STOP-DUB enrolled: (1) eligible patients for whom medical treatment had not been successful and who were randomized to either hysterectomy or EA and (2) an observational cohort of patients who were "provisionally ineligible" or who were eligible but did not wish to be randomized. Enrollment began in October 1997 and ended in June 2001. The primary outcome addressed by the randomized trial was the impact of surgery on bleeding, pain, fatigue, and the major problem (symptom) that led the woman to seek treatment for her condition, measured 1 year following surgery. Additional outcomes included the impact of surgery at time points after 1 year; changes in quality of life, activity limitation, sexual functioning, and urinary incontinence; surgical complications; additional surgery; and resource utilization. The costs and the relative cost-effectiveness of the two surgeries were calculated. The main scientific objective for the observational study was to examine changes over time in terms of treatment selected, DUB-related symptoms, and quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14500057     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00023-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  9 in total

1.  Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Rosalie J Fergusson; Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez; Anne Lethaby; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-29

2.  Periprocedural outcomes comparing fibroid embolization and focused ultrasound: a randomized controlled trial and comprehensive cohort analysis.

Authors:  Emily P Barnard; Ahmed M AbdElmagied; Lisa E Vaughan; Amy L Weaver; Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Gina K Hesley; David A Woodrum; Vanessa L Jacoby; Maureen P Kohi; Thomas M Price; Angel Nieves; Michael J Miller; Bijan J Borah; Krzysztof R Gorny; Phyllis C Leppert; Lisa G Peterson; Elizabeth A Stewart
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Tranexamic acid: a potential adjunct to resectoscopic endometrial ablation.

Authors:  Bulent Ergun; Ercan Bastu; Mehmet Ozsurmeli; Cem Celik
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec

4.  Prediction of treatment outcomes after global endometrial ablation.

Authors:  Sherif A El-Nashar; Matthew R Hopkins; Douglas J Creedon; Jennifer L St Sauver; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; William A Cliby; Abimbola O Famuyide
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Abnormal uterine bleeding: a review of patient-based outcome measures.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Lori A Boardman; Malcolm G Munro; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Fibroid interventions: reducing symptoms today and tomorrow: extending generalizability by using a comprehensive cohort design with a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ahmed M AbdElmagied; Lisa E Vaughan; Amy L Weaver; Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Gina K Hesley; David A Woodrum; Vanessa L Jacoby; Maureen P Kohi; Thomas M Price; Angel Nieves; Michael J Miller; Bijan J Borah; Krzysztof R Gorny; Phyllis C Leppert; Maureen A Lemens; Elizabeth A Stewart
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Retrospective database analysis of clinical outcomes and costs for treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding among women enrolled in US Medicaid programs.

Authors:  Machaon M Bonafede; Jeffrey D Miller; Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso; Andrea S Lukes; Nicole M Meyer; Gregory M Lenhart
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2014-10-08

Review 8.  Outcomes of patients who participate in randomized controlled trials compared to similar patients receiving similar interventions who do not participate.

Authors:  Gunn Elisabeth Vist; Dianne Bryant; Lyndsay Somerville; Trevor Birminghem; Andrew D Oxman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-07-16

9.  Endometrial resection and ablation versus hysterectomy for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez; Anne Lethaby; Rosalie J Fergusson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-02-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.