Literature DB >> 14499980

The evolving role of ultrasound in obstetrics/gynecology practice.

Z Papp1, T Fekete.   

Abstract

The value of ultrasound examinations depends heavily on the preparation of the personnel carrying out the examination and the technical capabilities of the equipment they use. Only well-organized regional or national programs are able to provide high level, cost-effective care based on certification of quality. Such certification must include the training of professionals, the definition of competence levels, accreditation of laboratories and the establishment of professional protocols. Together, these factors can guarantee the standard of care and provide legal protection for practitioners. It is worth carrying out routine screening in each pregnancy because the majority of abnormalities occur in pregnancies with low risk. Abnormalities detected on screening cases and the examination of high risk groups should be referred to higher level centers. Here, appropriate technical background and qualified personnel are present to provide cost-effective care. At the same time, necessary invasive interventions can also be performed. A minimum of three screening tests should be performed during pregnancy. The first should be performed at the fetal age of 10-14 weeks to detect abnormalities and pathological conditions in early pregnancy. The second one has to be performed between the fetal ages of 18 and 22 weeks to assess detailed fetal anatomy and rate of development. The third should be performed between the fetal age of 30 and 34 weeks to assess fetal anatomy, rate of development, placentation and circulation. It is worth considering a fourth screening at approximately 36-38 weeks to assess the intrauterine condition of the fetus and determine the appropriate method of delivery. Finally, besides improving the standard of living, education, and hygienic conditions in developing countries, developed countries also have to help improve the standard of pregnancy care. Within this context, the dissemination of diagnostic ultrasound must be given special emphasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14499980     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7292(03)00224-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  9 in total

1.  Community survey on awareness and use of obstetric ultrasonography in rural Sarlahi District, Nepal.

Authors:  Naoko Kozuki; Joanne Katz; Subarna K Khatry; James M Tielsch; Steven C LeClerq; Luke C Mullany
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.561

2.  Refugee and migrant women's views of antenatal ultrasound on the Thai Burmese border: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Marcus J Rijken; Mary Ellen Gilder; May Myo Thwin; Honey Moon Ladda Kajeechewa; Jacher Wiladphaingern; Khin Maung Lwin; Caroline Jones; François Nosten; Rose McGready
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Ultrasound's 'window on the womb' brings ethical challenges for balancing maternal and fetal health interests: obstetricians' experiences in Australia.

Authors:  Kristina Edvardsson; Rhonda Small; Ann Lalos; Margareta Persson; Ingrid Mogren
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Factors influencing referrals for ultrasound-diagnosed complications during prenatal care in five low and middle income countries.

Authors:  Holly L Franklin; Waseem Mirza; David L Swanson; Jamie E Newman; Robert L Goldenberg; David Muyodi; Lester Figueroa; Robert O Nathan; Jonathan O Swanson; Nicole Goldsmith; Nancy Kanaiza; Farnaz Naqvi; Irma Sayury Pineda; Walter López-Gomez; Dorothy Hamsumonde; Victor Lokomba Bolamba; Elizabeth V Fogleman; Sarah Saleem; Fabian Esamai; Edward A Liechty; Ana L Garces; Nancy F Krebs; K Michael Hambidge; Elwyn Chomba; Musaku Mwenechanya; Waldemar A Carlo; Antoinette Tshefu; Adrien Lokangaka; Carl L Bose; Marion Koso-Thomas; Menachem Miodovnik; Elizabeth M McClure
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 5.  Obstetric ultrasound use in low and middle income countries: a narrative review.

Authors:  Eunsoo Timothy Kim; Kavita Singh; Allisyn Moran; Deborah Armbruster; Naoko Kozuki
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  Audit of the appropriateness of the indication for obstetric sonography in a tertiary facility in Ghana.

Authors:  Emmanuel Kobina Mesi Edzie; Klenam Dzefi-Tettey; Philip Narteh Gorleku; Edmund Kwakye Brakohiapa; Benard Ohene Botwe; Adu Tutu Amankwa; Ewurama Andam Idun; Henry Kusodzi; Abdul Raman Asemah
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-09-14

7.  Prenatal Ultrasound Utilization and Its Associated Factors among Pregnant Women in Jimma Town Public Health Institutions, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Aynalem Yetwale; Tola Kabeto; Tsegaw Biyazin; Belete Fenta
Journal:  Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol       Date:  2022-03-07

8.  Obstetric ultrasound scanning by local health workers in a refugee camp on the Thai-Burmese border.

Authors:  M J Rijken; S J Lee; M E Boel; A T Papageorghiou; G H A Visser; S L M Dwell; S H Kennedy; P Singhasivanon; N J White; F Nosten; R McGready
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 9.  A review of fetal cardiac monitoring, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Camilo E Valderrama; Nasim Ketabi; Faezeh Marzbanrad; Peter Rohloff; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 2.688

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.