Literature DB >> 14499767

Endoscopic implantation of enteryx for treatment of GERD: 12-month results of a prospective, multicenter trial.

David A Johnson1, Robert Ganz, James Aisenberg, Lawrence B Cohen, Jacques Devière, T Raymond Foley, Gregory B Haber, Jeffrey H Peters, Glen A Lehman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopically implanting a nonresorbable biocompatible polymer (Enteryx) in the distal esophagus and proximal gastric cardia for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
METHODS: In a prospective, multicenter, international trial, 85 well-controlled GERD patients who were receiving chronic proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy underwent Enteryx implantation under fluoroscopic visualization, without general anesthesia. After the procedure, patients were discharged within approximately 2-4 h. Patients were judged to be treatment responders if after implantation they reduced PPI dosage by >/=50%. Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and included medication usage, symptoms, quality of life, endoscopy, pH monitoring, manometry, and documentation of adverse events.
RESULTS: At 12 months, 80.3% (95% CI = 69.9%-88.3%) of 81 evaluable patients were treatment responders. Of the responders, 87.7% completely discontinued PPIs, and 12.3% reduced PPI dosage by >/=50%. Treatment response was more likely in patients with residual implant volume of >/=5 mL (p = 0.027). Other patient and treatment variables were not predictive. Both GERD heartburn and regurgitation symptom scores significantly improved at 12 months compared with baseline (p < 0.001). There were significant reductions in median supine, upright, and total percent time of esophageal exposure to pH <4. Endoscopically assessed esophagitis grades were unchanged. No serious adverse events were encountered. Transient retrosternal chest pain was experienced by 91.8% of patients. This pain was seldom severe and was typically successfully managed with prescription pain medication.
CONCLUSIONS: Enteryx implantation allows most patients to discontinue PPI therapy, improves their symptoms, and reduces esophageal acid exposure. The effects of implantation are long-lasting, and morbidity is transient and minimal. The procedure requires basic endoscopic skills and seems to provide a useful option in the effective clinical management of GERD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14499767     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.08109.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  19 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic antireflux procedures.

Authors:  J Arts; J Tack; J P Galmiche
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 2.  Endoluminal treatment of GERD--role in contemporary clinical practice.

Authors:  John K DiBaise; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-08-04

3.  Multicenter Randomized Study of Obesity Treatment with Minimally Invasive Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Versus and Combined with Intragastric Balloon.

Authors:  Jerome Dargent; François Mion; Vianna Costil; René Ecochard; Frédéric Pontette; Valentin Mion; Stéphane Angella
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Delivery of radiofrequency energy to the gastroesophageal junction (Stretta procedure) for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  L Cipolletta; G Rotondano; L Dughera; A Repici; M A Bianco; C De Angelis; A M Vingiani; E Battaglia
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Long term failure of endoscopic gastroplication (EndoCinch).

Authors:  I Schiefke; A Zabel-Langhennig; S Neumann; J Feisthammel; J Moessner; K Caca
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Endoscopic therapy for GERD: is the evidence for efficacy any stronger?

Authors:  Pankaj J Pasricha; Binh V Pham
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02

7.  [Antireflux therapy--more than acid reduction?].

Authors:  T Frieling
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Endoscopic implantation of polymethylmethacrylate augments the gastroesophageal antireflux barrier: a short-term study in a porcine model.

Authors:  C P F Freitag; C R P Kruel; M E S Duarte; P R E Sanches; P R O Thomé; F Fornari; D Driemeier; F Teixeira; R O Mollerke; S M Callegari-Jacques; S G S Barros
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Prospective randomized controlled trial of an injectable esophageal prosthesis versus a sham procedure for endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Paul Fockens; Lawrence Cohen; Steven A Edmundowicz; Kenneth Binmoeller; Richard I Rothstein; Daniel Smith; Edward Lin; Nicholas Nickl; Bergein Overholt; Peter J Kahrilas; Nimish Vakil; Ayman M Abdel Aziz Hassan; Glen A Lehman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Do endoscopic antireflux procedures fit in the current treatment paradigm of gastroesophageal reflux disease?

Authors:  John E Pandolfino; Kumar Krishnan
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 11.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.