Literature DB >> 14499757

Spike cluster analysis in neocortical localization related epilepsy yields clinically significant equivalent source localization results in magnetoencephalogram (MEG).

D Van 't Ent1, I Manshanden, P Ossenblok, D N Velis, J C de Munck, J P A Verbunt, F H Lopes da Silva.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In magnetoencephalogram (MEG) recordings of patients with epilepsy several types of sharp transients with different spatiotemporal distributions are commonly present. Our objective was to develop a computer based method to identify and classify groups of epileptiform spikes, as well as other transients, in order to improve the characterization of irritative areas in the brain of epileptic patients.
METHODS: MEG data centered on selected spikes were stored in signal matrices of C channels by T time samples. The matrices were normalized and euclidean distances between spike representations in vector space R(CxT) were input to a Ward's hierarchical clustering algorithm.
RESULTS: The method was applied to MEG data from 4 patients with localization-related epilepsy. For each patient, distinct spike subpopulations were found with clearly different topographical field maps. Inverse computations to selected spike subaverages yielded source solutions in agreement with seizure classification and location of structural lesions, if present, on magnetic resonance images.
CONCLUSIONS: With the proposed method a reliable categorization of epileptiform spikes is obtained, that can be applied in an automatic way. Computation of subaverages of similar spikes enhances the signal-to-noise ratio of spike field maps and allows for more accurate reconstruction of sources generating the epileptiform discharges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14499757     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00156-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  7 in total

1.  Inverse modeling in magnetic source imaging: Comparison of MUSIC, SAM(g2), and sLORETA to interictal intracranial EEG.

Authors:  Karin L de Gooijer-van de Groep; Frans S S Leijten; Cyrille H Ferrier; Geertjan J M Huiskamp
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Authors:  Riitta Hari; Sylvain Baillet; Gareth Barnes; Richard Burgess; Nina Forss; Joachim Gross; Matti Hämäläinen; Ole Jensen; Ryusuke Kakigi; François Mauguière; Nobukatzu Nakasato; Aina Puce; Gian-Luca Romani; Alfons Schnitzler; Samu Taulu
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Regional differences in the sensitivity of MEG for interictal spikes in epilepsy.

Authors:  Geertjan Huiskamp; Zaloa Agirre-Arrizubieta; Frans Leijten
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Reproducibility of EEG-MEG fusion source analysis of interictal spikes: Relevance in presurgical evaluation of epilepsy.

Authors:  Rasheda Arman Chowdhury; Giovanni Pellegrino; Ümit Aydin; Jean-Marc Lina; François Dubeau; Eliane Kobayashi; Christophe Grova
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Network analysis of EEG related functional MRI changes due to medication withdrawal in focal epilepsy.

Authors:  Kees Hermans; Pauly Ossenblok; Petra van Houdt; Liesbeth Geerts; Rudolf Verdaasdonk; Paul Boon; Albert Colon; Jan C de Munck
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.881

6.  Combining EEG and MEG for the reconstruction of epileptic activity using a calibrated realistic volume conductor model.

Authors:  Ümit Aydin; Johannes Vorwerk; Philipp Küpper; Marcel Heers; Harald Kugel; Andreas Galka; Laith Hamid; Jörg Wellmer; Christoph Kellinghaus; Stefan Rampp; Carsten Hermann Wolters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Assessment of Effective Network Connectivity among MEG None Contaminated Epileptic Transitory Events.

Authors:  Abir Hadriche; Ichrak Behy; Amal Necibi; Abdennaceur Kachouri; Chokri Ben Amar; Nawel Jmail
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.238

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.