Literature DB >> 14499447

Presentation of pain drawings in questionnaire surveys: influence on prevalence of neck and upper limb pain in the community.

Rosie J Lacey1, Martyn Lewis, Julius Sim.   

Abstract

Pain drawings can be presented as either a blank or a pre-shaded manikin. This study sought to determine the effect of these two presentations on prevalence estimates of neck and upper limb pain (NULP), and their relationship to patterns of pain report. A postal questionnaire was sent to a stratified random sample of 10000 adults. It contained a blank body manikin and a pre-shaded neck and upper limb manikin screening question. Respondents answering positively to the pre-shaded manikin were asked about pain intensity, affect, disability and duration. Other measures included general health status (SF-12v2) and demographic questions. Adjusted response rate was 53.5%. Age-standardized 1-month period prevalence was 44.0% (crude prevalence 50.5%) for the screening question and 37.3% (crude prevalence 42.1%) for the blank manikin. There was 88% agreement between the pre-shaded manikin and the shading of corresponding areas on the blank manikin (kappa=0.76, 95% CI=0.74, 0.78). Of the 603 disagreements, 509 comprised no shading on the blank manikin but positive response to the pre-shaded manikin; they reported lower pain intensity, fewer days with pain, shorter time since initial onset and less disability than the 2030 reporting NULP on both manikins (P<0.001 in each case). The form of manikin presentation in a postal questionnaire can shift the reported prevalence of pain; a difference of 6.7% in our study. Furthermore, respondents only answering positively to a pre-shaded manikin form a group experiencing less severe NULP and less associated disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14499447     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00244-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  7 in total

Review 1.  The prevalence of neck pain in the world population: a systematic critical review of the literature.

Authors:  René Fejer; Kirsten Ohm Kyvik; Jan Hartvigsen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Reproducibility of pain manikins: a comparison of paper versus online questionnaires.

Authors:  Gareth T Jones; Ramona Kyabaggu; Debbi Marais; Gary J Macfarlane
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2013-08

3.  [Pain drawings of patients with orofacial pain. Comparison of acceptance and gain of information].

Authors:  C Geis; S Feierabend; W Böhner; H Kares; P Schirmer; E Busche; H J Schindler; J Siegert; S Hugger; J C Türp; A Hugger; C Sommer
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Colored Pain Drawing as a Clinical Tool in Differentiating Neuropathic Pain from Non-Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Nalini Sehgal; Debra B Gordon; Scott Hetzel; Miroslav Misha Backonja
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.750

5.  The impact of workplace risk factors on the occurrence of neck and upper limb pain: a general population study.

Authors:  Julius Sim; Rosie J Lacey; Martyn Lewis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Pain at multiple body sites and health-related quality of life in older adults: results from the North Staffordshire Osteoarthritis Project.

Authors:  Rosie J Lacey; John Belcher; Trishna Rathod; Ross Wilkie; Elaine Thomas; John McBeth
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 7.580

7.  Clustering of pain and its associations with health in people aged 50 years and older: cross-sectional results from the North Staffordshire Osteoarthritis Project.

Authors:  R J Lacey; V Y Strauss; T Rathod; J Belcher; P R Croft; B Natvig; R Wilkie; J McBeth
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.