Literature DB >> 14499417

Procedural pain in newborns at risk for neurologic impairment.

Bonnie Stevens1, Patrick McGrath, Sharyn Gibbins, Joseph Beyene, Lynn Breau, Carol Camfield, Allen Finley, Linda Franck, Alixe Howlett, Patricia McKeever, Karel O'Brien, Arne Ohlsson, Janet Yamada.   

Abstract

In the past decade, our knowledge of pain in newborn infants has advanced considerably. However, infants at significant risk for neurologic impairment (NI) have been systematically excluded from almost all research on pain in neonates. The objectives of this study were to compare: (a). the nature, frequency and prevalence of painful procedures, (b). analgesics and sedatives administered, and (c). the relationship between painful procedures and analgesia for neonates at risk for NI. One hundred and ninety-four infants at high (cohort A, n=67), moderate (cohort B, n=59) and low (cohort C, n=68) risk for NI from two tertiary level Neonatal Intensive Care Unit's in Canada were included in a retrospective cohort study on the first 7 days of life. Data were collected from medical records and analyzed using chi-square, ANOVA and regression approaches. All cohorts had a mean of >10 painful procedures per day during the first 2 days of life. There was an interaction effect between cohort group and day of life (F(5,188)=2.13, P<0.06) with cohort A having significantly more painful procedures on day 1 (F(2,191)=4.79, P<0.009). There was no statistical difference in the number of infants who received continuous infusion (F(2,20)=1.9, P=0.13) or bolus (F(2,20)=1.3, P=0.25) opioids or sedatives (F(2,20)=0.45, P=0.84) by cohort over the 7 day period. There was a statistical difference in bolus opioid administration for days 1 (P<0.05) and 2 (P<0.001) with less than 10% of infants in cohort A receiving bolus opioids compared with approximately 22-33% of infants in cohorts B and C. There was a statistically significant correlation between painful procedures and analgesic use (r=0.29, P<0.001), although significant associations existed for cohorts B and C only. The number of painful procedures and study site primarily accounted for the variance (61% in cohort B and 35% in cohort C) in analgesic use, while in cohort A, only study site contributed to the variance (16%). Neonates at the highest risk for NI had the greatest number of painful procedures and the least amount of opioids administered during the first day of life. There was no relationship between painful procedures and analgesic use in this group. As these infants are vulnerable to pain and its consequences, the rational underlying health professional strategies regarding painful procedures and analgesic use for procedural pain in this population urgently awaits exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14499417     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00136-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  27 in total

Review 1.  A review of systematic reviews on pain interventions in hospitalized infants.

Authors:  J Yamada; J Stinson; J Lamba; A Dickson; P J McGrath; B Stevens
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.037

2.  Are there long-term consequences of pain in newborn or very young infants?

Authors:  Gayle Giboney Page
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2004

3.  Aberrant synaptic integration in adult lamina I projection neurons following neonatal tissue damage.

Authors:  Jie Li; Elizabeth Kritzer; Paige E Craig; Mark L Baccei
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The effects of massage therapy to induce sleep in infants born preterm.

Authors:  Charlotte C Yates; Anita J Mitchell; Melissa Y Booth; D Keith Williams; Leah M Lowe; Richard Whit Hall
Journal:  Pediatr Phys Ther       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.049

5.  Neonatal Tissue Damage Promotes Spike Timing-Dependent Synaptic Long-Term Potentiation in Adult Spinal Projection Neurons.

Authors:  Jie Li; Mark L Baccei
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  A systematic review and meta-analyses of nonsucrose sweet solutions for pain relief in neonates.

Authors:  Mariana Bueno; Janet Yamada; Denise Harrison; Sobia Khan; Arne Ohlsson; Thomasin Adams-Webber; Joseph Beyene; Bonnie Stevens
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.037

7.  Neonatal procedural pain and preterm infant cortisol response to novelty at 8 months.

Authors:  Ruth E Grunau; Joanne Weinberg; Michael F Whitfield
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Factors affecting delivery of evidence-based procedural pain care in hospitalized neonates.

Authors:  Margot A Latimer; Celeste C Johnston; Judith A Ritchie; Sean P Clarke; Debra Gilin
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr

Review 9.  Neonatal Pain, Agitation, and Sedation Scale's use, reliability, and validity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mikayla E Morgan; Stephanie Kukora; Michelle Nemshak; Clayton J Shuman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 10.  Infant pain management: a developmental neurobiological approach.

Authors:  Maria Fitzgerald; Suellen M Walker
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Neurol       Date:  2009-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.