Literature DB >> 14498840

Ethical issues arising from a research, technology and development project to support frail older people and their family carers at home.

Lennart Magnusson1, Elizabeth Jane Hanson.   

Abstract

The present paper provides an overview of the application of the key ethical issues which arose in an EU-funded research, technology and development project, Assisting Carers using Telematics Interventions to meet Older Persons' Needs (ACTION). The primary aim of the ACTION project was to support frail older people and their family carers in their own homes across England, Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland, Sweden and Portugal via the use of user-friendly information and communication technology. Ethical guidelines were developed in the project and used as a tool to enable the multidisciplinary project team to increase their awareness of ethical issues in their everyday work, and to act as a useful ethical framework for regular team discussions at international and local meetings across the partner countries. A range of ethical issues arose during the field-study phases of the project when the ACTION services were introduced into a number of families' own homes. It can be argued that these ethical issues reflect factors relating both to the application of research into practice, as well as those relating more directly to the use of new technology by families and care professionals. Key issues centre upon the ethical concepts of autonomy, independence, quality of life, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice, and more specifically, on ethical issues of security, privacy and confidentiality, increased expectations, and withdrawal of the service. This paper is intended to facilitate dialogue and debate in the area of enabling (assistive) technology in home care for older people and their families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14498840     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2003.00446.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Soc Care Community        ISSN: 0966-0410


  8 in total

Review 1.  Ethical challenges with welfare technology: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Defining obtrusiveness in home telehealth technologies: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Brian K Hensel; George Demiris; Karen L Courtney
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Unobtrusive In-Home Monitoring of Cognitive and Physical Health: Reactions and Perceptions of Older Adults.

Authors:  Katherine Wild; Linda Boise; Jay Lundell; Anna Foucek
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2008

Review 4.  Ethical Design of Intelligent Assistive Technologies for Dementia: A Descriptive Review.

Authors:  Marcello Ienca; Tenzin Wangmo; Fabrice Jotterand; Reto W Kressig; Bernice Elger
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Willingness of older adults to share data and privacy concerns after exposure to unobtrusive in-home monitoring.

Authors:  Linda Boise; Katherine Wild; Nora Mattek; Mary Ruhl; Hiroko H Dodge; Jeffrey Kaye
Journal:  Gerontechnology       Date:  2013

6.  Can smartphone technology be used to support an effective home exercise intervention to prevent falls amongst community dwelling older adults?: the TOGETHER feasibility RCT study protocol.

Authors:  Helen Hawley-Hague; Carlo Tacconi; Sabato Mellone; Ellen Martinez; Angela Easdon; Fan Bella Yang; Ting-Li Su; A Stefanie Mikolaizak; Lorenzo Chiari; Jorunn L Helbostad; Chris Todd
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Prevailing Opinions on Connected Health in Austria: Results from an Online Survey.

Authors:  Daniela Haluza; Marlene Naszay; Andreas Stockinger; David Jungwirth
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Care relationships at stake? Home healthcare professionals' experiences with digital medicine dispensers - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sigrid Nakrem; Marit Solbjør; Ida Nilstad Pettersen; Hanne Hestvik Kleiven
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.