Literature DB >> 1448244

Does closure of Camper fascia reduce the incidence of post-cesarean superficial wound disruption?

G O Del Valle1, P Combs, C Qualls, L B Curet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether closure of Camper fascia prevents the development of superficial wound disruption after cesarean delivery.
METHODS: During a 1-year period, 438 women undergoing cesarean delivery were randomized into groups with and without approximation of Camper fascia with absorbable suture during closure of the abdominal incision. All women received routine postoperative care following our departmental guidelines. We reviewed charts after the puerperium to identify women with postoperative superficial wound disruption and to obtain demographic and delivery information for analysis.
RESULTS: We found a significantly higher incidence of wound disruption in the group without the suture than in those in whom the tissue was approximated (P = .03). Four or more vaginal examinations and higher body mass index were also associated with a higher incidence of wound disruption (P = .05 and P = .04, respectively). Logistic regression correction for covariables that might influence the results of our main analysis revealed no effect of maternal age, parity, indications for cesarean delivery, duration of labor, duration of ruptured membranes, duration of surgery, use of internal monitoring, type of incision, use of antibiotic prophylaxis, surgeon's level of training, or maternal diabetes mellitus and/or hypertension.
CONCLUSION: Approximation of Camper fascia with absorbable suture at closure of the abdominal incision during cesarean delivery appears to protect against postoperative superficial wound disruption and is therefore recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1448244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  4 in total

1.  A phase II trial of a surgical protocol to decrease the incidence of wound complications in obese gynecologic oncology patients.

Authors:  Akiva P Novetsky; Israel Zighelboim; Saketh R Guntupalli; Yevgeniya J M Ioffe; Nora T Kizer; Andrea R Hagemann; Matthew A Powell; Premal H Thaker; David G Mutch; L Stewart Massad
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Surgical Site Infection following Cesarean Delivery: Patient, Provider, and Procedure-Specific Risk Factors.

Authors:  Raj Shree; Seo Young Park; Richard H Beigi; Shannon L Dunn; Elizabeth E Krans
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Techniques and materials for closure of the abdominal wall in caesarean section.

Authors:  E R Anderson; S Gates
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

4.  Wound complication among different skin closure techniques in the emergency cesarean section: a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Bhimeswar Nayak G; Pradip Kumar Saha; Rashmi Bagga; Bharti Joshi; Minakshi Rohilla; Shalini Gainder; Pooja Sikka
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-12-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.