Literature DB >> 1447986

General practitioners' attitudes to computer-generated surgical discharge letters. Members of the Department of General Surgery, Fremantle Hospital.

W M Castleden1, M C Stacey, P E Norman, M M Lawrence-Brown, J G Brooks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess general practitioners' attitudes to a computed-generated general surgical discharge letter. To identify the six most important items of information in an ideal discharge letter.
DESIGN: One hundred and thirty general practitioners who had received at least six computer-generated surgical discharge letters in one year were circulated with a questionnaire.
RESULTS: Most general practitioners approved of the computer-generated discharge letter which included all six of the most important items of information they requested. Eighty-four per cent wished to see a similar computer-generated discharge system extended into other areas of hospital practice.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1447986     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1992.tb137245.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  5 in total

1.  Hospital discharge information after elective total hip or knee joint replacement surgery: A clinical audit of preferences among general practitioners.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Nadia Lee; Moira Sim; Toby J Leys; Piers J Yates
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2012-10-31

2.  Improving communication between hospital and community physicians. Feasibility study of a handwritten, faxed hospital discharge summary. Discharge Summary Study Group.

Authors:  J M Paterson; R L Allega
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Audit and feedback: an intervention to improve discharge summary completion.

Authors:  Anca Dinescu; Helen Fernandez; Joseph S Ross; Reena Karani
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.960

4.  Dictated versus database-generated discharge summaries: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  C van Walraven; A Laupacis; R Seth; G Wells
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-02-09       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  The safety implications of missed test results for hospitalised patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joanne Callen; Andrew Georgiou; Julie Li; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 7.035

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.