Literature DB >> 1446447

In vitro bone-cell response to a capacitively coupled electrical field. The role of field strength, pulse pattern, and duty cycle.

C T Brighton1, E Okereke, S R Pollack, C C Clark.   

Abstract

Newborn rat calvarial bone cells were grown to confluence and subjected to a matrix of sine wave 60-kHz capacitively coupled electrical signals of various field strengths, pulse-burst patterns, and duty cycles. Both [3H] thymidine incorporation into DNA and alkaline phosphatase activity were evaluated in field strengths ranging from 0.0001 to 20 mV/cm, with pulse-burst patterns ranging from continuous to 5 milliseconds ON/495 milliseconds OFF, with daily duty cycles ranging from 0.25% to 25%. A significant increase in proliferation occurred in field strengths of 0.1, 1, and 20 mV/cm when the signal was applied continuously for six hours. Significant proliferation also occurred when the 20-mV/cm field was pulsed for six hours at 5 milliseconds ON/495 milliseconds OFF and at 5 milliseconds ON/245 milliseconds OFF. No change in alkaline phosphatase activity occurred in the 20-mV/cm field with any signal. At 1 mV/cm, there was a significant decrease in alkaline phosphatase activity in the continuous signal and in the 5 milliseconds ON/62 milliseconds OFF signal; in the lower fields evaluated, there was an actual decrease in alkaline phosphatase activity with some of the signals. The field strength plays a dominant role in determining the bone-cell's proliferative response, and to a lesser extent the alkaline phosphatase activity response, to a capacitively coupled electric field. The pulse configuration and the duty cycle are also important, but only if the proper field strength is being applied to the cell.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1446447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

1.  Galvanic reactions between cerclage wires and Kuntscher nails.

Authors:  M T Taylor; P E Wilson
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Bone healing in 2016.

Authors:  John A Buza; Thomas Einhorn
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2016-10-05

Review 3.  How to correctly estimate the electric field in capacitively coupled systems for tissue engineering: a comparative study.

Authors:  João Meneses; Sofia Fernandes; Nuno Alves; Paula Pascoal-Faria; Pedro Cavaleiro Miranda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  3D-printed scaffolds with carbon nanotubes for bone tissue engineering: Fast and homogeneous one-step functionalization.

Authors:  Xifeng Liu; Matthew N George; Sungjo Park; A Lee Miller Ii; Bipin Gaihre; Linli Li; Brian E Waletzki; Andre Terzic; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  A new piezoelectric actuator induces bone formation in vivo: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Joana Reis; Clara Frias; Carlos Canto e Castro; Maria Luísa Botelho; António Torres Marques; José António Oliveira Simões; Fernando Capela e Silva; José Potes
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-05-31

6.  Induction of chondrogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells by low frequency electric field.

Authors:  Mohammad Mardani; Shiva Roshankhah; Batool Hashemibeni; Mohammadreza Salahshoor; Erfan Naghsh; Ebrahim Esfandiari
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2016-05-30

7.  A Multimodal Stimulation Cell Culture Bioreactor for Tissue Engineering: A Numerical Modelling Approach.

Authors:  João Meneses; João C Silva; Sofia R Fernandes; Abhishek Datta; Frederico Castelo Ferreira; Carla Moura; Sandra Amado; Nuno Alves; Paula Pascoal-Faria
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 4.329

8.  The science of electrical stimulation therapy for fracture healing.

Authors:  Paul Rt Kuzyk; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Modulation of Osteogenesis in MC3T3-E1 Cells by Different Frequency Electrical Stimulation.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Haitao Cui; Zhenxu Wu; Naipeng Wu; Zongliang Wang; Xuesi Chen; Yen Wei; Peibiao Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Biophysical stimulation of bone and cartilage: state of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Leo Massari; Franco Benazzo; Francesco Falez; Dario Perugia; Luca Pietrogrande; Stefania Setti; Raffaella Osti; Enrico Vaienti; Carlo Ruosi; Ruggero Cadossi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.