Literature DB >> 1444652

A prospective evaluation of plasma-TFE and expanded PTFE grafts for routine and early use as vascular access during hemodialysis.

T S Helling1, P W Nelson, L Shelton.   

Abstract

The use of prosthetic grafts as vascular access for chronic hemodialysis is frequently necessary in patients with end-stage renal disease. Most commonly, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) has been employed because of ease of handling, tissue inertness, and acceptable long-term patency. Delay in use to allow for tissue ingrowth, however, has often required placement of temporary access devices. The authors have undertaken evaluation of a new material, plasma polymerized woven dacron Plasma-TFE, in a prospective randomized trial (Plasma-TFE VA) to compare clinical behavior against e-PTFE grafts, and we have used the Plasma-TFE grafts in an additional group of patients (Plasma-TFE AVA) as early access (within 1 week of implantation). Twenty-one Plasma-TFE grafts were implanted in 19 patients and 19 e-PTFE grafts were implanted in 17 patients in a prospective randomized fashion. Additionally, 31 Plasma-TFE grafts were implanted in 31 nonrandomized patients for early access. Primary patency rates in Plasma-TFE VA and e-PTFE grafts were equivalent at 12 months (0.471 and 0.556). When Plasma-TFE AVA primary patency was included (0.621), comparisons were not statistically significant (p = 0.50). Similarly, secondary patency rates among the three groups did not differ (cumulative proportion patent at 12 months: Plasma-TFE VA 0.403, e-PTFE 0.658, Plasma-TFE AVA 0.510). In considering after-revision patency after graft thrombosis, however, the Plasma-TFE grafts (both VA and AVA) performed significantly more poorly (p = 0.027) than e-PTFE grafts. Incidence of graft infection, wound infection, arm edema, hematoma from use, and occurrence of distal limb ischemia between Plasma-TFE (VA and AVA) and e-PTFE did not differ statistically. The authors conclude that Plasma-TFE compares favorably to e-PTFE with respect to primary and secondary patency and nonthrombotic complications, even with early use. Plasma-TFE does not perform as well as e-PTFE, however, after graft thrombosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1444652      PMCID: PMC1242679          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199211000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  17 in total

1.  Subclavian vein stenosis as a complication of subclavian catheterization for hemodialysis.

Authors:  B S Spinowitz; M Galler; R A Golden; J H Rascoff; L Schechter; B Held; C Charytan
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1987-02

2.  PTFE grafts for hemodialysis access. Techniques for insertion and management of complications.

Authors:  S Raju
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Late vascular complications of the subclavian dialysis catheter.

Authors:  G F Fant; V W Dennis; L D Quarles
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Salvage operations for malfunctioning polytetrafluoroethylene hemodialysis access grafts.

Authors:  E E Etheredge; S D Haid; M N Maeser; G A Sicard; C B Anderson
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Immediate, safe hemodialysis into arteriovenous fistulas created with a new tunneler. An 11 year experience.

Authors:  L A Taucher
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula.

Authors:  M J Brescia; J E Cimino; K Appel; B J Hurwich
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1966-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Comparison of autogenous fistula versus expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft fistula for angioaccess in hemodialysis.

Authors:  G M Kherlakian; L R Roedersheimer; J J Arbaugh; K J Newmark; L R King
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Upper arm graft fistula for hemodialysis.

Authors:  D L Steed; C E McAuley; R Rault; M W Webster
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Subclavian stenosis: a major complication of subclavian dialysis catheters.

Authors:  N Barrett; S Spencer; J McIvor; E A Brown
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.992

10.  Blood compatibility of surfaces modified by plasma polymerization.

Authors:  Y S Yeh; Y Iriyama; Y Matsuzawa; S R Hanson; H Yasuda
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1988-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  An early study on the mechanisms that allow tissue-engineered vascular grafts to resist intimal hyperplasia.

Authors:  Heather L Prichard; Roberto J Manson; Louis DiBernardo; Laura E Niklason; Jeffrey H Lawson; Shannon L M Dahl
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.132

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.