Literature DB >> 1444592

Temporal scales in ecological risk assessment.

J Burger1, M Gochfeld.   

Abstract

The process of human health risk assessment (HRA) was formalized in 1983 by the National Research Council to include hazard identification, dose-response analyses, exposure assessment and risk characterization. Risk assessment for ecologic endpoints is emerging as a new discipline. Although environmental impact statements have been conducted for many years, ecologists, managers and policy makers are beginning to formalize the process in terms of risk, and are adapting the HRA paradigm to ecological risk assessment (ERA). In this paper it is suggested that the temporal scales of the two processes differ, and that these differences should be incorporated in ecological risk assessment. Even when HRA techniques are applied to a single non-human species there are temporal variations including: (1) different and often variable life spans, (2) unpredictable lengths of lifestages and different metamorphic stages, and (3) indeterminate growth in some species. When these differences are considered for multispecies assemblages, the impact on the food web will result in exposures of differing magnitudes affecting different species. The challenges for ERA include developing general principles for estimating or predicting exposure to critical life stages of the dominant species in an ecosystem, and establishing the appropriate temporal scales for predicting impacts or evaluating outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1444592     DOI: 10.1007/BF00203814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol        ISSN: 0090-4341            Impact factor:   2.804


  6 in total

1.  Ecotoxicological effects assessment: a comparison of several extrapolation procedures.

Authors:  P C Okkerman; E J vd Plassche; W Slooff; C J Van Leeuwen; J H Canton
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  Biological Integrity: A Long-Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management.

Authors:  James R Karr
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  Ecosystem Modeling with Lisrel: A New Approach for Measuring Direct and Indirect Effects.

Authors:  Michael L Johnson; Donald G Huggins; F DeNoyelles
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.657

4.  Ecological Risk Assessment at The Regional Scale: Ecological Archives A005-001.

Authors:  R L Graham; C T Hunsaker; R V O'Neill; B L Jackson
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Difficulties in extrapolating the results of toxicity studies in laboratory animals to man.

Authors:  D P Rall
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1969-10       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Initial evaluation of developmental malformation as an end point in mixture toxicity hazard assessment for aquatic vertebrates.

Authors:  D A Dawson; T S Wilke
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.291

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Evolutionary consequences for ecological risk assessment and management.

Authors:  M Gochfeld; J Burger
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Methods for and approaches to evaluating susceptibility of ecological systems to hazardous chemicals.

Authors:  J Burger
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.031

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.